"If Trump is elected, in little more than a year people will be smashing coffee makers in support of child molesters!"
-Kicking myself over deleting that prediction.

— Quentin Hardy (@qhardy) November 13, 2017

Hey Fish:

How do you feel what-abouting on behalf of a paedophile? Does it make you feel good in your soul to know you're carrying water for someone that you probably wouldn't leave your children with?

Here, this might help. Here are some great talking points to change the topic:

"Technically, that's called hebeophilia."

"Of course I had to support the pederast. I am thinking of my children's future."

"Yeah, but one time Clinton ordered a cheese pizza, and that's basically child porn."

"What about all these celebrities and/or Anthony Wiener? I mean, just because you immediately threw them under the bus when it came to light they were HUGE peices of shit doesn't absolve you from ostensibly holding the same political views as perverted monsters!"

I look forward to our completely predictable future together.

"I want to see the longform yearbook."

You mean all 0 of my posts seeing how I have been inactive during that entire ordeal?

Try again, bitch.

What about Bill Clinton? You realize the entire election, I was anti-Clinton, because of her husband right? I wasn't* exactly shy about that.

Again, try again, *bitch.*

Thanks, typo fixed.

I might be stupid enough to have typos, but I am not stupid enough to what-about for fucking pederast.

Even if I showed you a fucking video of him fucking your child, you'd claim hax. You realize the standard of reasonable doubt applies to a court room, yes? The idea being if there is any reasonable way you could think this wasn't the case, you shouldn't put a man in jail.

Do you operate under the pressure of reasonable doubt in your ever day life? If so, do you run outside and grab the grass to keep from flying into the sky? I mean, there is reasonable doubt that gravity will work at any given time. We could, after all, be hit by a comet. That's a reasonable possibility. We've been hit many times.

The point------>
(Your head.)

Enjoy your pedophilia apologetics.

OH yeah, as for proof: "I always get the mother's permission" - Roy Moore.

Go right the fuck ahead and post something about them if you wish to have conversation about them.

In the mean time, please tell me how admitting to doing this on TV doesn't count as evidence to you?

I am not going to post shit for you. If you want to have that conversation, then fucking have it. Don't have it here where it has fuck to do with fuck all.

And don't fucking pretend this about politics for *me.* I am a survivor myself. As I keep telling you, fucking post something and call my bluff if you think I am bluffing. Right now? This conversation is about your disgusting behaviour in defence of another repugnant asshole. As for my behaviour, so far you've come up with a perfect batting average the easy way.

No, you are having a conversation where you attempt to bring every other case you can think of to use as some sort of checklist so that you don't have to examine your own beliefs. You are what-abouting a man who went on TV and said that he doesn't date teenagers... except those times he did, and made sure to ask their mother's permission first.

Why am I miserable? Because I am a cunt, sir. It's my lot in life. I am pretty self aware about it. Which puts me one up on you.

I dont think Fish has the karma to post

Well in that case, I welcome him to see all the ways he's a bitch.

When you wrestle a pig, you just get dirty and the pig enjoys it.

Don't disagree. It's just this particular pig will shit all over themselves just to make us smell it.

"hey, look over there!" = brilliant political strategem

no, if you weren't trying to deflect and distract to cover your pet pedo's ass you would be upset about both rather than one instead of the other. and you wouldn't use one alleged instance to run interference for the other.

fuck I missed you

Yeah, and I'll Google Pizzagate while I'm at it you utter dollop.

Crazy Fish spreading his discredited pizzagate fake news. Sad!

Failing #BannonBreitbart FAKE NEWS wants us to talk about Clinton, but what about Bill Cosby? DISGRACEFUL!

Crazy Fish's first time mentioning rapist Cosby is when called out on not mentioning rapist Cosby. Coincidence? NOT!

I was confining my comments to politicians your side ignores when discussing attacks on women.

But by all means, let's discuss leftist entertainers who treat women like shit.

Who you got?

Crazy Fish admits ignoring rapists republicans, only interested in spreading FAKE NEWS!! Expected but DISAPPOINTED!

Argument.

You suck at it.

I try to make friends with Crazy Fish but he is still ignoring #RapistRepublicans. SO RUDE!

^
Mad Max “That’s bait” gif

I'm happy to see those horrible pod coffee machines getting smashed for whatever reason. All of them. Everywhere.

Get yourselves a Bialetti, folks.

Fuck that. Chemex all the way!

No no. Aeropress is the way.

"Liberals are offended by this video of a Keurig being thrown off of a building."

P sure most liberals would applaud getting rid of a device as wasteful as a Keurig.

yeah, let's see them try to make coffee without a needlessly wasteful machine to hold their hand through it!

My favourite part of watching idiots smash their Keurigs on social media because they pulled funding for Hannity over his apologetics for kid touching:

Leaving comments asking why they feel more strongly about a coffee machine than a pederast and asking where they plan to get their coffee now, since Starbucks cups still aren't red or say "Merry Christmas."

"Innocent until proven guilty" is a perfectly fine stance to hang your hat on. However, if you have a working brain you should realize this is past the point of prosecution, so that will not be happening. Further, there is a different between having an opinion on someone's guilt or innocence and legally punishing them. In this case, if you are of the opinion he is a pederast, it's not exactly a punishment to deny him the privilege of being a Senator. This is pretty basic.

Roy Moore is on record, being banned from a public shopping mall due to his creeping on teenagers there. That signature in that poor woman's year book is his to a T. There are over a dozen corroborating witnesses, none of which have contradictory statements despite knowing the victim(s) at different stages in their life.

At this point, to believe there is no fire where this smoke rises means you have turned off your brain.

As for Clinton, you clearly don't fucking know me. I will take any excuse to drag Bill Clinton through the mud. Ask BBQ there how I feel about him, he was there when I told everyone here that my stance on Hillary could not be separated from my hatred for Bill.

You're a fucking tool, and all you have is what-aboutism and deflection.

So Fish, tell me... what was Clinton found guilty of? You see, I am in the position where I can still hold these things against him because I am not taking the full of retard stance you are. I believe, Clinton was found guilty of lying. I don't believe he was found guilty of anything else? By your own standard, shouldn't you be shutting the fuck about it right now?


As for my center, I honestly believe the man did what he is accused of because of the preponderance of evidence. I am a person that acts upon his opinion. As for your fucking concept that something can't be proven and thus must be a lie, you're a god damn idiot. I said he couldn't be TRIED. That is not the same thing at all, and to jump to the conclusion you did reeks of desperation.

As for handwriting, I am not an expert, though the ones I whom have been quoted to me seem pretty sure of it. However, even without it, you still are faced with the problem of multiple corroborating witness, with the same story, and no discernible contact with each other for decades. That is one hell of a fucking long con if it took over 30 years of laying groundwork to pull off.

As for the mall, and other stories out of Ethowah, doesn't look good:

https://www.newyorker.com/news/news-desk/locals-were-troubled-by-roy-moores-interactions-with-teen-girls-at-the-gadsden-mall

https://www.thedailybeast.com/report-alabama-mall-banned-roy-moore-in-the-80s-for-pursuing-teens

http://www.al.com/news/index.ssf/2017/11/gadsden_residents_say_moores_b.html

https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/moore-dated-highschool-girls_us_5a07944ce4b05673aa59a22f

What is coming out of Etowah County is not a story that supports the narrative of an innocent man.

Hey look, people giving their names and going on the record about it! Including a (still) republican colleague stating in no uncertain terms the man's proclivity for teenagers. So here, practice this line to help feel better: "Technically, it's call hebephilia."

Did Paula Jones lie? Did Bill Clinton pay her?

No idea on either question, but I certainly wouldn't put it past the dicknose.

Did Bill Clinton have sex with an intern– a young woman over whom he had power? Did that affair ruin her life?

Yes he did, and in sense yes.

As for all the rest of you question, and really these ones too: irrelevant, bitch. I get to hold these things against Bill, you don't. I guess you do get to hold something against Ted though. He admitted full out.

al.com, well known fucking liberal rag.
https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/al-com-alabama-news/

No, it's code for "I refuse you to let you drag this into what-aboutism any further" if you want to talk about Ted Kennedy, JFK, Clinton, Menendez... start a fucking thread about them. Otherwise, this is fucking irrelevant.

You are one to speak about embarrassing. You are literally defending a man who went on national TV and told the world he gets the permission of parents before dating teenagers while simultaneously claiming there is no evidence that he is attracted to and has dated teenagers.

Uh... just so we are clear, you are excusing hebephilia because he made sure it was okay with their parents first? And I am surprised you missed it. It was on Fox, after all.

As for my outrage, go ahead post and see how selective it is. My refusal to let you what-about here any further is because it's fucking disgusting, Fish. You are digging deep to defend the indefensible. Try me. See how much leeway I give one of these people that are supposedly on my side.

Of course I am not going to post something FOR a troll. If you want to have that conversation, fucking have it. Make a post. It's quite simple.

As for being a hypocrite, have I asked you "Did Donald Trump admit to sexual assaults on tape?" ten ways from sunday? No? Why not?

Because despite it being the same subject matter, it's not the same fucking subject. At your core, you are a small, bitter little man, without a shred of personal accountability or moral compass. All you care about is trying to get a rise out of people and shilling for your side. You want me to call out my side? Post something about it. Otherwise, shut the fuck about it. It's not responsibility to make your point for you.

Oh, almost forgot:

Glad you took my advice on "technically it's hebephilia." Well, not in those words, but you are excusing a 32 year old man making moves on 16 year olds. So, basically the same thing.

Crazy Fish never once spoke out against Bill Cosby rape scandal, just spreads failing #BannonBreitbart FAKE NEWS... SAD!

Uh, my credibility is not on trail here, because I am not the one what-abouting on this thread. I am telling you if you want to what-about, please make a post, and I will happily get into any of this with you. I suspect you will not, because this isn't even about making your point. This about trying shit all over yourself just so everyone else here has to smell it.

Know the difference between you and I?

I hold people that agree with me to account just the same as those that disagree. I have no love for Menendez, Wiener, Wienstien ... none of em. I think they are getting what they deserve.

You however, think the people like this on your side deserve to be senators.

Your unironic usage of the phrase "locker-room talk"™ makes is painfully obvious that you're nothing more than a troll. You don't believe anything you're saying is actually relevant, and I'm fairly confident betting that you don't necessarily think much of it is demonstrably true. You're well aware of your false equivalencies and there is no reason for anyone here to address them in any serious manner. You aren't a real person. Clinton and Trump are both rapists, Moore and Menendez are both child predators, the DNC and the GOP are both criminal organizations, and you're human garbage if you put your support behind any of them... buuuut this fucking article is about retards destroying coffee makers.

There's a difference between sides. One is liberal, and the other is conservative. When your desire is to destroy liberalism, you defend your side with lies and and distractions while attacking the other with a constant barrage of a mix of lies and truth. Because the object of the game is to win at all costs. Even if the only win is in your own head because you think yourself clever at insulting and demeaning others.

Welp, they can always go down to the local mall for coffee, assuming they haven't been banned
https://www.thedailybeast.com/report-alabama-mall-banned-roy-moore-in-the-80s-for-pursuing-teens