Non-Violent Resistance -
The philosophy of Satyagraha, holding on to The Truth
|
Saturday, 23 July 2016
quote [ From:MARSHALL@dnc.org
To: MirandaL@dnc.org, PaustenbachM@dnc.org, DaceyA@dnc.org Date: 2016-05-05 03:31 Subject: No shit It might may no difference, but for KY and WVA can we get someone to ask his belief. Does he believe in a God. He had skated on saying he has a Jewish heritage. I think I read he is an atheist. This could make several points difference with my peeps. My Southern Baptist peeps would draw a big difference between a Jew and an atheist. ] “I do not recall this. I can say it would not have been Sanders. It would probably be about a surrogate.” - DNC CFO Brad Marshall
Just so I am following you here, Brad... you were talking some other jewish atheist running for president?
Could you maybe clue me in as to who that might be? Because the one I was gonna vote for unfortunately didn't get on your party's ticket! So, if there is some other jewish atheist running for president besides Bernie Sanders, I would like to know his or her name, so I can consider voting for them.
|
kylemcbitch said @ 4:40am GMT on 25th July
Well, I think I can bring the total instances of obvious foul play to 3.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6564
April 25th, before Clinton secured the math.
kylemcbitch said @ 4:51am GMT on 25th July
Well, I think I can bring the total instances of obvious foul play to 3.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6564
April 25th, before Clinton secured the math.
To be clear, the issue isn't the polling location in RI. The issue is they did not wish to correct it because that is their job (it is,) they wished to correct it because Bernie Sander's campaign might bring it up. If that is not an example of working for one campaign and against the other, I am very a certain a good lawyer could easily convince someone it is.
kylemcbitch said @ 4:55am GMT on 25th July
Well, I think I can bring the total instances of obvious foul play to 3.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6564
April 25th, before Clinton secured the math.
To be clear, the issue isn't the polling location in RI. The issue is they did not wish to correct it because that is their job (it is, since clearly they are supposed to be running this bitch,) they wished to correct it because Bernie Sander's campaign might bring it up, and that might damage their side. If that is not an example of working for one campaign and against the other, I am very a certain a good lawyer could easily convince someone it is.
kylemcbitch said @ 4:56am GMT on 25th July
Well, I think I can bring the total instances of obvious foul play to 3.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/5289
April 25th, before Clinton secured the math.
To be clear, the issue isn't the polling location in RI. The issue is they did not wish to correct it because that is their job (it is, since clearly they are supposed to be running this bitch,) they wished to correct it because Bernie Sander's campaign might bring it up, and that might damage their side. If that is not an example of working for one campaign and against the other, I am very a certain a good lawyer could easily convince someone it is.
<-- Entry / Current Comment
kylemcbitch said @ 4:40am GMT on 25th July
Well, I think I can bring the total instances of obvious foul play to 3.
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/5289
April 25th, before Clinton secured the math.
To be clear, the issue isn't the polling location in RI. The issue is they did not wish to correct it because that is their job (it is, since clearly they are supposed to be running this bitch,) they wished to correct it because Bernie Sander's campaign might bring it up, and that might damage their side. If that is not an example of working for one campaign and against the other, I am very a certain a good lawyer could easily convince someone it is.
