Eh, so far 99% of the smoking guns reddit has pointed me to are literally nothing. There are few really bad looking ones, like... I am pretty sure there is at least 1 FEC violation and a few emails that indicate the DNC has way too comfortable a relationship with news media well outside the bounds of normal journalistic ethics... but so far trying to find straight up bias against Bernie, aside from the email I put as the post, it's been a bunch of complete misses.

Reddit is making a huge stink about emails from the 26th of April showing the DNC was prepared to call it for Hillary. I don't know how long these idiots were drinking the kool-aid at the Sander's Camp for Wayward Dumbasses and Part Time Detectives but April 26th is when Clinton basically had it wrapped up (2100 of the 2300 needed.)

About to call it a night, but if anyone finds something fun let me know.

I take it back. I have found something.

Okay, I have found nothing of any actual consequence.

But I have found Pablo.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6387
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/5013
https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/8127

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/7532 --Pure comic gold, since now everyone has this number

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/6549 -- I am still digging, but I am pretty sure these people are talking about someone plans to fire Pablo's ass.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/3044 -- But clearly, he is a man with a knack for dodging bullets.

You fucking amazing bastard, Pablo.

"I am coming to talk to you Pablo."

Oh, shit!

Who is Pablo?

Pablo Manriquez, formerly Director of Hispanic Media at the DNC, currently at the U.S. Hispanic Chamber of Commerce.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/06/10/democratic-national-committees-political-director-departs/

Also nothing really, but hilarious:

The Chair is having a hard time getting even people on her own side to give specifics about her progressive credentials trying to deflect (what we now know is valid) claims by Bernie of being biased:

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4252

Okay, I am officially convinced the DNC is probably the most toxic place to work at I can imagine. These people hate everything, especially work, and especially each other.

Which does make this pretty fucking funny to read.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/4075

Well, I think I can bring the total instances of obvious foul play to 3.

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/5289

April 25th, before Clinton secured the math.

To be clear, the issue isn't the polling location in RI. The issue is they did not wish to correct it because that is their job (it is, since clearly they are supposed to be running this bitch,) they wished to correct it because Bernie Sander's campaign might bring it up, and that might damage their side. If that is not an example of working for one campaign and against the other, I am very a certain a good lawyer could easily convince someone it is.

Okay... make that 4 and a perhaps the only one that even matters now:

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/20695

https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/658

Looks like appointments to federal government boards and commissions are being demonstrably tied to fund raising operations of the Democratic Party... why is the National Finance Director of the DNC in charge of collecting the names for commissions and boards?

Also, all of those donors are people who contributed to Hillary Clinton (none of them are also contributors to Bernie.)

Also, this list was begun on April 21st before the math was in on April 26th. This is probably going to be a problem for the DNC and Hillary.

The big tell here is David Shapira, it's marked USPS, Obama nominated him and the Republicans rejected him. He gave $33,400 to the DNC (and they are asking his wife for more here: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/16182)

You will also note that many of the names appearing on the list for Board and Commission are also listed as having given the maximum donation allowed: https://wikileaks.org/dnc-emails/emailid/15306

Correct me if I'm wrong, but doesn't all this latest nontroversy point out is that Hillary tried to beat Bernie, on purpose? Bernie is a career politician, but not for the Democrats. Once the other Democrat candidates dropped out of the race, that made Hillary the de facto head of the party. Then it was just a contest for the nomination between the party selection and an outsider who was only present because anyone who declares themselves a Democrat can seek the party nomination.

Well technically speaking the DNC should remain neutral in the contest for the party nomination, at least until there's a clear victor. The RNC actually did a pretty good job of this with their outsider candidate, much to the chagrin of party loyalists. Maybe it helps when the chairperson isn't a career politician with a personal stake in the outcome.

So apparently the Clinton campaign is blaming the Russians for the breech, presuming they want Trump to win.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-politics/wp/2016/07/24/clinton-campaign-manager-russians-leaked-democrats-emails-to-help-donald-trump/

Seems kind of plausible.

Also, just how much money from Russia is propping up Trump? And just how much is he willing to do to keep things that way?

http://talkingpointsmemo.com/edblog/trump-putin-yes-it-s-really-a-thing

Discuss. I know nothing of the publication - picked this u over at the FT - but it seems a fairly well put together piece.

It's pretty obvious to me, at least, that Trump is in bed with Putin and the Russians. He's also not worth dick. I believe it's been suggested his actual worth is $110 millionish. I would not be surprised if Trump is relying on Russian cash to hide how fucking poorly he is doing financially. (Relatively speaking, of course.)


Talking Points Memo is a liberal publication, so yeah, bias is a question.... though I think they are in the right here. Trump is in bed with the head of often hostile and rival state, and that relationship seems one sided (as in, Putin hold all the cards.)

Sadly, idiots on the right seem to really like Putin for some reason, so I am pretty sure they wont give a single fuck.

Putin really does seem to garner some support from cons for some reason. I guess a portion of the freedom crowd really respond to this sort of leadership. The stern father thing. Perverse, but hardly surprising. They are nought but overgrown children.

And thanks for the steer on the source.

Let's get this around without attribution - in regards to an article painting Bernie supporters as violent.