|
Friday, 20 May 2016
quote [ A sexual predator who falsely claimed to be transgender and preyed on women at two Toronto shelters... ]
Because intellectual honesty means acknowledging opposing arguments.
Yes, I'm throwing our resident troll a bone here. Not that I agree with numbers' beliefs, to be clear, but because of the above reason.
Interestingly, I haven't heard anyone on either side reference this case when talking about the NC law, even though (or perhaps because) it predates this whole debate by several years. One bad apple etc., but we can't claim this "never happens" because it clearly did at least once.
|
1234 said @ 11:02am GMT on 22nd May
I concede that not everyone finds the same things interesting. But while you’re being honest, which I very much appreciate, perhaps you’d do me the kindness of answering a question, because I see that your referred to Mr. Wolscht as though he were a woman – I am genuinely curious, do you share Mr. Wolscht’s view that he is six years old?
And, if I’m not pressing my luck, I’d hazard a follow-up question: As Mr. Wolscht clearly “identifies” as being a six-year old, should the state insist that the local primary school find a place for him in their grade one class, if Mr. Wolscht wishes to attend?
(BTW – the question need not be the exclusive purview of arrowhen – Any of the folk on this board who believe Mr. Wolscht should be treated as a woman by the state are welcome to weight in on the appropriate approach to his schooling)
1234 said @ 11:03am GMT on 22nd May
I concede that not everyone finds the same things interesting. But while you’re being honest, which I very much appreciate, perhaps you’d do me the kindness of answering a question, because I see that you referred to Mr. Wolscht as though he were a woman – I am genuinely curious, do you share Mr. Wolscht’s view that he is six years old?
And, if I’m not pressing my luck, I’d hazard a follow-up question: As Mr. Wolscht clearly “identifies” as being a six-year old, should the state insist that the local primary school find a place for him in their grade one class, if Mr. Wolscht wishes to attend?
(BTW – the question need not be the exclusive purview of arrowhen – Any of the folk on this board who believe Mr. Wolscht should be treated as a woman by the state are welcome to weight in on the appropriate approach to his schooling)
<-- Entry / Current Comment
1234 said @ 11:02am GMT on 22nd May [Score:-1]
I concede that not everyone finds the same things interesting. But while you’re being honest, which I very much appreciate, perhaps you’d do me the kindness of answering a question, because I see that you referred to Mr. Wolscht as though he were a woman – I am genuinely curious, do you share Mr. Wolscht’s view that he is six years old?
And, if I’m not pressing my luck, I’d hazard a follow-up question: As Mr. Wolscht clearly “identifies” as being a six-year old, should the state insist that the local primary school find a place for him in their grade one class, if Mr. Wolscht wishes to attend?
(BTW – the question need not be the exclusive purview of arrowhen – Any of the folk on this board who believe Mr. Wolscht should be treated as a woman by the state are welcome to weight in on the appropriate approach to his schooling)
