Friday, 13 January 2017
quote [ Privacy campaigners criticise WhatsApp vulnerability as a ‘huge threat to freedom of speech’ and warn it could be exploited by government agencies ]
|
midden said @ 11:30pm GMT on 13th Jan
[Score:1 Good]
Trusting any non-open source program for security is unwise.
Try Open Whisper's Signal app: https://whispersystems.org/ |
spazm said @ 8:07pm GMT on 13th Jan
Did anyone expect differently? Really?
|
lilmookieesquire said @ 9:05pm GMT on 13th Jan
Not at all, but still disappointed.
|
rylex said[1] @ 9:22pm GMT on 13th Jan
see my previous statements about google being untrustworthy since it is contracted by our government, and extrapolate to other internet companies.
btw. ZTE phones are complete crap. |
HP Lovekraftwerk said @ 9:57pm GMT on 13th Jan
I'd be curious to know how an app company could make something that allows encrypted communication, regular updating, and a revenue stream for the coders that couldn't somehow be hacked and/or compromised by governments. If it was possible, could it survive legal challenges?
|
foobar said @ 11:26pm GMT on 13th Jan
Sure, it's simple; don't store messages non-locally. Then there's nothing to subpoena.
|
HP Lovekraftwerk said @ 11:38pm GMT on 13th Jan
But that doesn't cover interception, does it?
|
foobar said @ 11:52pm GMT on 13th Jan
I was referring to legal challenges.
|
HP Lovekraftwerk said @ 1:06am GMT on 14th Jan
Right, but I had several points about why this never seems to work out, that just being one of them. It just takes one change in the TOS because of a big payout and there goes privacy.
It also doesn't help that retention of user data happens at some level at some instance in the use of every internet-enabled application (even if for a brief time), and that such data is often what the apps trade on (selling to advertisers), leading to abuse. |
midden said @ 11:37pm GMT on 13th Jan
Well, Open Whisper is a nonprofit.
|
knumbknutz said @ 12:39am GMT on 14th Jan
Put everything on the cloud they said - it'll be GREAT they said...
|