|
Wednesday, 28 September 2016
quote [ The Saudi government denies any role in those attacks, and the 9/11 Commission found no evidence that the Saudi government as an institution or senior Saudi officials were involved. Fifteen of the 19 hijackers were from Saudi Arabia, though, and there have long been suspicions that some of the hijackers received support during their time in the U.S. from individuals with possible connections to the Saudi Kingdom.
Supporters of the veto override say those suspicions should be explored in a U.S. court of law. ] I see this as a dumb bill, since one country suing another in the plaintiff's home country is kind of kangaroo court-ish. I think this just shows the fear of seeming to somehow be less patriotic about 9/11 is still alive and well.
|
Comments
 |
Bob Denver said @ 9:01pm GMT on 28th Sep
[Score:1 Funny]
Well,now at least the US might be held accountable for all of the dog's breakfast results of their statecraft... We might yet see a kinder, gentler US. Ah hahahaha!
|
|
XregnaR said @ 9:10pm GMT on 28th Sep
Wish in one hand and crap in the other, see which one fills up first.
|
|
HP Lovekraftwerk said @ 11:22pm GMT on 28th Sep
What if you wish your hand was full of crap?
|
|
Kelyn said @ 11:39pm GMT on 28th Sep
Depends on which hand you wished to be full of crap I suppose.
|
|
Kelyn said @ 8:39pm GMT on 28th Sep
Well shit.
|
|
foobar said @ 3:26am GMT on 29th Sep
Wouldn't this be a case for some sort of international criminal court?
|
|
Kama-Kiri said @ 4:10am GMT on 29th Sep
No because unilateral exceptionalism.
|
|
zarathustra said @ 4:17am GMT on 29th Sep
Sure, if it wasn't an election year.
|
Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment,
then click the reply link on that comment instead]You must be logged in to comment on posts.
