Monday, 18 April 2016

UC Berkeley student removed from Southwest flight for speaking Arabic

quote [ “Why would you speak in Arabic on the airplane?” the employee asked him. “It’s dangerous. You know the environment around the airport. You understand what’s going on in this country.” ]

Seems like internment camps would just be a lot more efficient.

Reveal

UC Berkeley student removed from Southwest flight after speaking Arabic on plane

By Yanan Wang April 18 at 5:11 AM

Earlier this month, Khairuldeen Makhzoomi found himself at a gathering with United Nations Secretary General Ban Ki-moon. He had been invited to the dinner-and-lecture event in Los Angeles by a friend who works for the World Affairs Council, and he was thrilled.

The University of California, Berkeley senior is a double major, after all, in political science and Near Eastern studies. At the close of Ban Ki-moon’s speech, Makhzoomi recounted in a phone interview with The Washington Post Sunday night, he stood up to ask the secretary general about Iraqi Popular Mobilization units, militia groups fighting against the Islamic State.

The question was greeted by applause from around the room, followed by a lengthy response from the U.N. chief. It was the kind of exchange that Makhzoomi lives for: having come to the United States as an Iraqi refugee six years ago, his research centers on how life can be improved in his home country.

But the next day, April 6, the 26-year-old’s fortunes took a sharp turn.

Makhzoomi had just settled into his seat on a Southwest Airlines flight when he pulled out his cellphone to call his uncle in Baghdad. His uncle is a political analyst, so Makhzoomi wanted to discuss last night’s event with him.

He was speaking into the phone in Arabic when he noticed that the woman in the seat in front of him was turned with her neck craned in his direction, staring.

Feeling discomfited, Makhzoomi cut his conversation short. “Inshallah,” he told his uncle, using a customary Arabic phrase meaning “God willing.” “I’ll call you when I land.”

After Makhzoomi hung up, he noticed that the woman had left her seat and was making her way up the aisle, weaving around passengers who were still boarding.

His sense of unease deepened. A thought occurred to him: I hope she’s not reporting me.

Except, Makhzoomi is now certain, that is precisely what happened. Shortly after the woman’s departure, a Southwest employee informed Makhzoomi, “Sir, you need to step out of the plane right now.”

Makhzoomi was then led off the plane to a hallway by the boarding gate, where three police officers were awaiting him. He said the Southwest employee appeared to be of Middle Eastern descent, and began speaking to him in Arabic. The employee told him he used to live in Dubai, and asked him where he was from. At Makhzoomi’s urging, the employee switched back to English.

“Why would you speak in Arabic on the airplane?” the employee asked him. “It’s dangerous. You know the environment around the airport. You understand what’s going on in this country.”

The employee’s tone made Makhzoomi feel demeaned. He was immediately deferential.

“I’m sorry,” Makhzoomi responded. “I shouldn’t have done that.” But the employee continued to be accusatory, and Makhzoomi said he grew frustrated. Exasperated, the college student said, “This is what Islamophobia has done.”

This only angered the employee further. According to Makhzoomi, one of the police officers then said into his radio: “Call the FBI.”

With the plane long taken off without him, Makhzoomi was joined by more police officers, sniffer dogs, and eventually, three FBI agents. At one point, a police officer pressed his head against the wall and restrained his hands behind his back. When the authorities asked him whether he had any weapons on him, Makhzoomi said he teared up. “I don’t have a knife,” he repeated.

The FBI agents took him into a separate room and began the questioning anew.

“Okay, you need to be honest with me,” Makhzoomi recalled one agent saying to him. “Tell us everything you know about martyrdom.”

Makhzoomi was stunned. “I looked at her and opened my eyes very wide,” he told The Post. “I told her I never mentioned this word, ever. You can call my uncle — I have never mentioned that word. It’s associated with jihad and terrorism, and gives a false image of Islam.”

He said the agents were interested in his family’s ties to Iraq. His mother, brother and he fled the country for Jordan in 2002, a year after his father was executed under Saddam Hussein’s regime, Makhzoomi told The Post.

He said his father was a former Iraqi diplomat who was jailed in Abu Ghraib, then killed for what authorities there called a “security threat.” The family now lives in Berkeley, Ca.

After further questioning, the FBI agent let him go, but told him he could not fly with Southwest. Makhzoomi was directed to get his refund from the same Southwest employee who asked him to leave the plane.

The employee wordlessly swiped Makhzoomi’s credit card. At last he booked a flight with Delta Air Lines, arriving back in Berkeley nine hours later than he originally intended. Before his itinerary was disrupted, he had been planning to attend classes that same afternoon.

Southwest wrote in an email statement to The Post that their “Crew made the decision to investigate a passenger report of potentially threatening comments overheard onboard our aircraft…While local law enforcement followed up with that passenger in our gate area, the flight departed.”

“We regret any less than positive experience a Customer has on Southwest,” the statement further said. “Safety is our primary focus, and our Employees are trained to make decisions to safeguard the security of our Crews and Customers on every flight. We would not remove a passenger from a flight without a collaborative decision rooted in established procedures.”

The company cited privacy reasons for not commenting specifically about Makhzoomi’s case, but iterated: “Southwest neither condones nor tolerates discrimination of any kind.”

“We were asked to respond, and we determined no further action was necessary,” Ari DeKofsky, a spokeswoman for the FBI’s Los Angeles office, told the San Francisco Chronicle.

Makhzoomi said he has attempted to reach the airline three times and received only cursory responses. Southwest said in its email that the company cannot find “record of the Customer contacting us and have tried multiple times to reach him after learning of his disappointment” from an article in the UC Berkeley student newspaper.

Stories of Muslims being removed from commercial flights have become more common alongside an escalating fear of Islamic State terrorism.

In the same week that Makhzoomi’s incident took place, a hijab-wearing woman from Maryland was ordered off a Southwest flight bound for Seattle. In late March, an Arab American family was removed from a United Airlines flight due to safety concerns. The airline said the decision was prompted by the family’s inadequate child booster seat, but the family believes they suffered discrimination because the mother wears a headscarf.

“We are tired of Muslim-looking passengers being removed from flights for the flimsiest reasons, under a cryptic claim of ‘security,'” Ahmed Rehab, executive director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations in Chicago, said in a statement.

As for Makhzoomi, the college student said he does not currently have plans to take legal action, though several lawyers have offered their services. For now, he said he just wants Southwest to publicly acknowledge their error.

“I came here to the U.S. because I believed in the values of this country,” Makhzoomi said. “Islamophobia does not serve to fight terror. It plays right into the Islamic State game of striking fear among us.”
[SFW] [travel] [+10 WTF]
[by sanepride@3:42pmGMT]

Comments

Adam said @ 7:30pm GMT on 18th Apr [Score:3 Underrated]
Dear Southwest: Next time escort the idiot who thinks all Arabic speakers are suspicious off the plane. Clearly too stupid to fly.
sanepride said @ 7:35pm GMT on 18th Apr
I like this sentiment. Unfortunately Southwest is based in Texas- I'm not saying this has anything to do with their current protocols but this may have something to do with their current protocols. OK I guess I am saying it, that's what happens when you apply negative cultural stereotypes.
spleen23 said @ 12:51am GMT on 19th Apr
While I agree that anyone, including a Arabic man should be able to speak whatever language they want to speak in public or private, there is nothing here suggesting the woman who complained was stupid.

Bigoted yes, cruel even, but not necessarily stupid.

The guy however failed a basic cultural awareness test by jabbering in Arabic, in America, on a airplane.

He is not responsible for what happened to him, but with even a little foresight he had the power to avoid it regardless of the fact he should not have had to.
HP Lovekraftwerk said @ 2:02am GMT on 19th Apr
Let me get this straight: In America, a place that at least pays lip service to the freedom of speech, you think speaking Arabic should be treated the same way the TSA treats joking about hijacking or bombs?

I can't wait to see the helpful signs you're surely designing to be posted in our nation's airports. It should go over really well, especially if you add "Trump 2016" at the end.
arrowhen said @ 5:55am GMT on 19th Apr
Hey, it's freedom of speech, not freedom of jabber! If he wanted free speech he should have spoke American!
spleen23 said @ 11:29am GMT on 19th Apr
Let me get this straight: on a webpage, a place in which my words are written down, I start with a sentence supporting a person's right to speak any language they want to and end with a sentence making it clear that others should be held responsible for the way he was treated, you think I am supporting him being pulled off a plane and interrogated?

Let me also compare you with trump supporters as a reactionary, judgmental twit.

Good day sir.
HP Lovekraftwerk said @ 12:51pm GMT on 19th Apr
"The guy however failed a basic cultural awareness test by jabbering in Arabic, in America, on a airplane."

Your sense of self-awareness is truly non-existent.
spleen23 said @ 6:41pm GMT on 19th Apr
You have the right to walk into a dark alley waving hundred dollar bills in both hand singing "I got money, so much money." without being attacked and robbed, similarly you have the right to have a conversation on the phone, on a plane, in muslimphobic America, without being harassed.
However, both either of the above scenarios worst outcomes could be avoided with a little foresight, which this guy failed to use, mentioning this does not mean I support the actions of those who targeted him, only that they were predictable.

Your ability to analyze is truly crippled by your self righteousness.
sanepride said @ 10:28pm GMT on 19th Apr
Sorry dude but you're indulging in a bit of victim-blaming here. All the guy did was talk on his cell phone in a foreign language. Why should anyone have to think twice before doing this?
spleen23 said @ 10:56pm GMT on 19th Apr
Practicality over theory. In theory and in all morality he should be able to speak in Arabic during a phone conversation, in practically and reality he should known that he has to deal with bigotry and talking to his uncle in Arabic could mean several hours of being detained and questioned, as well as missing his flight.
As I said the responsibility for all of this shit rest solely on the people who pulled him off the plane. He is only responsible for his failure of situation awareness, which he would be responsible for even if nothing had happened because of it.
sanepride said @ 11:22pm GMT on 19th Apr
So should all Muslim and Arabic-speaking people in the US constantly have this situation awareness in public? Isn't this akin to black people having to worry about what happens when they get stopped by the police? What if the guy speaking Arabic on the plane happened to be a fair-skinned blonde guy?
Now I can buy an argument that people should not be talking about jihad and bombs in public, sensitive places like on airplanes. But I refuse to buy an argument that anyone should have to curb their speech or behavior just to placate bigots and racists.
Because when we do that, we're basically conceding to the bigots and letting them dictate the terms of society.
spleen23 said @ 1:30am GMT on 20th Apr
Everyone should have this kind of awareness, but most certainly the above around airports if they want to make their flight. Yes, that is a very good analog if you substitute the word everyone in place of black people. Then he would not look like a Arabic dude in a country where a fair percent of the population is terrified by Arabic looking dudes. Good, I agree, no one should curb their speech, but they may find it better choice for their own convenience.
In this case, the bigot did dictate the terms of society getting pulled off his flight, harassed for hours on end and being banned from a airline seems like a bigger win for the dictating bigots then someone being forced by the terms of society to use English on a phone call to avoid dealing with any potential bullshit.

sanepride said @ 2:42am GMT on 20th Apr [Score:1 Informative]
Just to provide some context, here's an interesting analysis from a former flight attendant suggesting how this incident should have properly been handled.
Fish said @ 4:18am GMT on 20th Apr
Appeal to Authority Fallacy.

Authority is a flight attendant.

My sides!
sanepride said @ 4:35am GMT on 20th Apr
Is there some aspect of that article you disagree with?
Onix said @ 2:11am GMT on 19th Apr
I have to wonder how many people speaking Hebrew could be scorted out of a plane just because someone thought they were speaking Arabic. Or any Catholics from Lebanon who actually speak Arab. I am also thinking about Catalunian or Aragonese speakers here. I think your particular argument is not valid since people can talk whatever language they want and in any case to most American ears nothing but English and maybe Spanish can sound really weird.
Bob Denver said @ 2:53am GMT on 19th Apr [Score:1 Funny]
"Aragonese" has to be the best name for a language. But for a 'r' one could support those unjustly escorted off an aircraft: "Stand your ground, stand your ground! Sons of Gondor, of Rohan, my brothers! I see in your eyes, the same fear that would take the heart of me."
Onix said @ 4:02am GMT on 19th Apr [Score:1 Interesting]
It's actually pretty cool. Sort of a broken Spanish spoken with a lot of balls even in sotto voce. Not really Tolkieneske unless you get them drunk.
Bob Denver said @ 6:23am GMT on 19th Apr [Score:1 Interesting]
Neat. I love Catalunya and was amazed to discover that the language is almost a blending of French and Spanish. I could make sense of a lot of (written) words with my being able to read French. Oddly, I can make sense of a lot of Spanish because it seems to be a blend of French and German, at least many word roots suggest one or the other. Damn, I want to go back to Barcelona!
Onix said @ 11:51pm GMT on 19th Apr
It's the first time I hear that Spanish sounds like a mix of French and German, I swear. French is the most closely related of the two because they share the same roots in Latin and Romance, but that German reference is making me think. I have tried German in the past and I can hardly read it, mostly based on its similarities with English. I am a bit better in French, but mostly because as soon as I get it going I just have to remember stuff from childhood. I guess if I spent more than a few weeks in a French-speaking area I'll get good at it.

My guess is that they all are what I call "implicitly threatening" languages, in the sense that people just talk too loud sometimes and vocalizes in a very calculated way when they want to make their point across. I mean, sometimes we can sound pretty rude and hysterical even when we are being nice to someone.

The same thing happens, at least to my ears, with Japanese. You could hear two guys talking and swear that they will tear their heads off with their teeth, but they could be actually just asking for the time of the day and just saying thank you afterward.
arrowhen said @ 11:56pm GMT on 19th Apr [Score:1 Funny]
The Japanese probably have specific etiquette for thanking someone after tearing their head off with your teeth.
Onix said @ 1:52am GMT on 20th Apr
They probably do. I bet giant robots thank kaijus after they kill them.
Bob Denver said @ 12:07am GMT on 20th Apr [Score:1 Interesting]
It's not that they sound the same; I just find that knowing French and German helps me to understand written Spanish.
Onix said @ 1:50am GMT on 20th Apr
Oh. I see it now and I agree. If you know German you can learn half the languages of Europe. You, sir, are a very educated man. and that's very nice. Congratulations.
Bob Denver said @ 2:57am GMT on 20th Apr [Score:1 Funny]
Thank you but I cheated...I learned the languages by falling in love with women from those countries as a younger man. My fickle heart made me, for a while, a polyglot.
Onix said @ 3:34am GMT on 20th Apr
Well, I also learned Russian because I wanted to bed a Russian girl, as well as some Tagalog and Portuguese. The least you have to know about a foreign language is how to ask for help, order food and meet the opposite sex. Everything else is superfluous.
HoZay said @ 3:47am GMT on 20th Apr [Score:1 Funny]
Estoy siendo detenido?
Onix said @ 5:49am GMT on 20th Apr
Oh, that too. And I forgot about begging for your life.
Pandafaust said @ 9:35am GMT on 19th Apr
Hey, how about any number of tourists from Arabic-speaking countries who are flying interstate and don't speak English. Or are talking to each other. I mean, I speak English when I'm overseas.
spleen23 said @ 10:14pm GMT on 19th Apr
Since the very first line of my argument was stating that anyone be able to speak whatever language they want as a given, I'm not sure how agreeing with me invalidates it
XregnaR said @ 3:51pm GMT on 18th Apr
SouthWest seems to have a storied history of foot-in-mouth syndrome.
mechavolt said @ 4:06pm GMT on 18th Apr
Public surprised when airline, known for treating passengers like cattle, further degrades passengers.
sanepride said[1] @ 4:26pm GMT on 18th Apr
Not to defend Southwest for what seems to be a disproportionate number of such incidents, but as the largest discount domestic carrier, we really shouldn't be surprised that they'd have more cases of both passengers and crew behaving like the common jerks we know the US public can be (as evidenced by Trump's popularity). It's really just a bigger slice of the populist pie that happens to be flying their low-cost skies. On the plus side, at least they still don't charge for checked luggage.
Bleb said @ 4:28pm GMT on 18th Apr
A degree of slap-upside-the-head should be reserved for the hysterical cunt who reported him in the first place. Apologies if my misogynistic micromacroagression triggers anyone.
HP Lovekraftwerk said @ 5:15pm GMT on 18th Apr [Score:1 Underrated]
I'd reserve a much larger slap for the FBI agents that decided an interrogation was warranted, as well as their superiors who are apparently okay with this.
sanepride said @ 7:07pm GMT on 18th Apr
Obviously they're doing a hell of a job winning the trust and cooperation of the Muslim community.

Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment, then click the reply link on that comment instead]

You must be logged in to comment on posts.



Posts of Import
Karma
SE v2 Closed BETA
First Post
Subscriptions and Things

Karma Rankings
ScoobySnacks
HoZay
Paracetamol
lilmookieesquire
Ankylosaur