Tuesday, 17 November 2015

Groundwater is mostly non-renewable, study finds

quote [ Less than 6% of groundwater is replenished within 50 years

The water that supplies aquifers and wells that billions of people rely on around the world is mostly a non-renewable resource that could run out, a new Canadian-led study has found.

While many people may think groundwater is replenished by rain and melting snow the way lakes and rivers are, underground water is actually renewed much more slowly. ]

Nestle is trying to open another plant in southern Ontario. There are already areas in Ontario that are depleted so much that Nestle gives the locals free water from the plant. I`m not a fan of bottled water and carry a Nalgene most places I go.

Full CBC Article

The water that supplies aquifers and wells that billions of people rely on around the world is mostly a non-renewable resource that could run out, a new Canadian-led study has found.

While many people may think groundwater is replenished by rain and melting snow the way lakes and rivers are, underground water is actually renewed much more slowly.

In fact, just six per cent of the groundwater around the world is replenished within a "human lifetime" of 50 years, reports University of Victoria hydrogeologist Tom Gleeson and his collaborators in a new study published in the journal Nature Geoscience today.

That water tends to be mainly found within a few hundred metres of the surface, where it is most vulnerable to being contaminated by pollution or depleted by higher temperatures and reduced rainfall as a result of climate change, the researchers found.

"Groundwater is a super-important resource," Gleeson said in an interview with CBC News. "It's used by more than a third of the world's population every day for their drinking water and it's used by agriculture and industry."

More than a third of the Canadian population relies on groundwater, including the entire population of P.E.I. and some fairly large urban centres such as Kitchener-Waterloo, Cambridge and Guelph in Ontario, Gleeson added.

Because groundwater is so important to billions of people around the world, Gleeson and colleagues at the University of Texas at Austin, the University of Calgary, and the University Gottingen were interested in finding out how much groundwater there is in the world and to get an idea of when it will run out.

Nuclear clues

Scientists had previously made a rough estimate of the amount of groundwater in the world, but no one knew how much is renewable and how quickly it's replenished.

Gleeson and his colleagues came up with a way to figure out what groundwater was less than 50 years old. In the 1960s, during the Cold War, a number of countries were doing above-ground nuclear testing. This introduced a radioactive form of hydrogen, called tritium, into the world's water supply.

The researchers figured that groundwater with high levels of tritium was renewed since the 1960s. Groundwater with negligible levels was older.

By looking at 3,500 measurements of tritium in groundwater from 55 countries and using computer models to trace the flow of groundwater around the world, they were able to estimate how much groundwater was young and renewable and how much was older.

They also confirmed the total quantity of groundwater around the world using a variety of data like the permeability of rock to the flow of water and how much water could be stored in different places, based on how porous the rock there was.

A look at previous estimates of total groundwater showed the crude calculations were not far off.

"When we actually went back and traced what the actual calculation, it was literally two lines of text that someone could do at a bar," Gleeson said. "But the amazing thing was that they were right."

His team came up with almost exactly the same number.

Plentiful but finite

They estimated that the total amount of groundwater in the world was 22.6 million cubic kilometres — enough to cover all the land on Earth to a depth of 180 metres. The amount that was renewable was no more than 1.3 million cubic kilometres or less than six per cent. But the researchers said that was likely an overestimate due to the types of rock in the areas where most of the measurements were taken. Correcting for that suggested that the actual amount of groundwater renewable within 50 years was likely only 0.35 million cubic kilometres, or enough to cover all the land on Earth to a depth of just three metres.

Tom Gleeson
'Groundwater is a super-important resource,' says Tom Gleeson, the University of Victoria hydrogeologist who led the study. 'It's used by more than a third of the world's population every day for their drinking water.' (University of Victoria)

The good news is that the amount of renewable groundwater on Earth is quite large —- three times larger than all other fresh water contained in lakes and rivers on Earth, the researchers reported.

But it isn't evenly distributed. There was less groundwater, especially younger groundwater, in more arid regions.

Gleeson said in places like California and the U.S. Midwest, people are already using "non-renewable" water that is thousands of years old and in places such as Egypt, they're tapping into water that may have last been renewed a million years ago. Such old water isn't just non-renewable — it tends to be saltier and more contaminated than younger groundwater.

In addition, overusing groundwater, either old or young, can lower subsurface water levels and dry up streams, which could have a huge effect on ecosystems on the surface, Gleeson added.

He hopes the study will help remind and motivate people to manage their groundwater resources better. "And realize that it's finite and a limited resource that we need to respect and manage properly."

Credit to NASA Study finding that we`re running out...
http://sensibleendowment.com/entry.php/2251

[SFW] [science & technology] [+5]
[by OutdoorRudy@3:16pmGMT]

Comments

HoZay said @ 6:56pm GMT on 17th Nov
Sorry, but Nestle has a duty to its stockholders to maximize return on their investment, which must take precedence to your silly hippy-dippy dreams about eco-whatever and sustainability, and "the future" blah blah blah.
OutdoorRudy said @ 8:09pm GMT on 17th Nov
Can we not agree then to raise the cost of bottled water and reduce the consumption, thus keeping profits up. I merely want water to be available for the horses who drink from the wells on the farms...
HP Lovekraftwerk said @ 12:55am GMT on 18th Nov
Hell, I want them to pay the same rates for water that consumers do at least.

If what they do to that H2O is so magical (it's practically homeopathic the way some people go on about it), then it shouldn't be hard to sell it for a profit.
OutdoorRudy said @ 8:02am GMT on 18th Nov
It says on the bottle that it's basically straight tap water.

The Royal Winter Fair is in town in Toronto. Last year there was one water fountain at the south-west corner of what's known as the Direct Energy Centre, this year it's been replaced by patched drywall. One water fountain for an event that attracts thousands..... And now it's gone.

The bottled water companies did a good job in the 90s at promotin water fountains as bacteria, disease ridden places..... I fell for it, as did most but I've woken up and realized that there no worse then they ever were.

I'm sick and tired of saying to my friends... Enjoy your plastic bottle/bag.... It's your children's, children who will see that turned to soil. 30 seconds use for a 100years of decomposition. Grab a Nalgene...

I'm drunk but this is one of those things that irks me. Grab a Nalgene and a carabiner, nothing like fresh cold tap water. :)

HoZay said @ 6:53am GMT on 18th Nov
I'm kidding, fuck Nestle, and the stockholders, too.
But you still have to jack off the horses.
OutdoorRudy said @ 7:42am GMT on 18th Nov
"I'm kidding" is you just admitting that the horse is right. If jack asked you to help him off a horse would help jack off the....

Lol. Cheers
Dr.Faustus said @ 9:22pm GMT on 17th Nov
"Whiskey is for drinking, water is for fighting." True in the arid Southwestern US, becoming true in many other places.
arrowhen said @ 1:35am GMT on 18th Nov
"I don't drink water. Fish fuck in it."
midden said @ 2:36am GMT on 18th Nov
Well, they aren't the only ones. You should try it!
Abdul Alhazred said @ 3:03am GMT on 18th Nov [Score:1 Underrated]
I have. The water washes away the natural lubrication, if you're in a tub the water sloshes out of the bath, if you're in a lake it's cold and public and there are probably bugs dive bombing your head, and if you're in a shower it's awkward and potentially a slipping hazard.

2/10, would not recommend.
midden said @ 6:03am GMT on 18th Nov
Slowing down seems to fix most of those issues.
midden said @ 2:35am GMT on 18th Nov
The central valley of California has been steadily sinking since farming took off there in the 30s. There are some places where the ground has dropped as much as 28 feet as the water has been pumped out from below. As the surface drops, the spaces that the water used to fill collapse. The ground won't just float back up if/when the aquifers begin to fill. Those spaces are a product of tens of thousands of years of water and soil coming to equilibrium. We could stop pumping today and it will still take many centuries to return the underground water supply to even half of what it was less than a hundred years ago.

Here's a paper produced jointly by NASA's JPL and Cal Tec describing the problem.
http://www.courthousenews.com/2015/08/20/NASA_REPORT.pdf

Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment, then click the reply link on that comment instead]

You must be logged in to comment on posts.



Posts of Import
Karma
SE v2 Closed BETA
First Post
Subscriptions and Things

Karma Rankings
ScoobySnacks
HoZay
Paracetamol
lilmookieesquire
Ankylosaur