Friday, 20 April 2018

Democratic Party files lawsuit alleging Russia, the Trump campaign and WikiLeaks conspired to disrupt the 2016 campaign

quote [ "During the 2016 presidential campaign, Russia launched an all-out assault on our democracy, and it found a willing and active partner in Donald Trump’s campaign," DNC Chairman Tom Perez said in a statement.

"This constituted an act of unprecedented treachery: the campaign of a nominee for President of the United States in league with a hostile foreign power to bolster its own chance to win the presidency." ]

Now that's how an opposition party behaves. "Unprecedented treachery", well put.
[SFW] [politics] [+7 Good]
[by hellboy@5:50pmGMT]

Comments

knumbknutz said @ 7:10pm GMT on 20th Apr
Severely guarded optimism...I remember all too well how the whole "fitzmas" thing turned out.
hellboy said[1] @ 7:40pm GMT on 20th Apr
Yeah I'm with you on both of those things. I think this is good news because:
1. It shows that the Democrats are willing to stick up for themselves instead of hiding behind being the party out of power. And if they're filing the suit they must feel like there's enough ground for them to stand on.
2. It opens up a third front in the fight to expose the treason, making it less likely that the Dumpster can make it all go away by firing Rosenstein or Mueller.
steele said @ 8:35pm GMT on 20th Apr [Score:1 Underrated]
1 is a nice thought, but I have a hard time as seeing it as anything more than the typical, "2016 isn't our fault, we don't have to change!"
hellboy said @ 8:54pm GMT on 20th Apr [Score:1 Funsightful]
They're not mutually exclusive. The lawsuit can lead to discovery, take the pressure off Mueller, and (as was the case with Watergate) even potentially lead to a win and settlement. I'm probably about as cynical about the DNC as you are (within an order of magnitude anyway ;-), and I consider the filing of the lawsuit and the use of "unprecedented treachery" rather than the usual weasel words (like say "questionable partisanship") as good signs not that the DNC has learned their lesson but that they at least are pretty confident in their case. That bodes well for eventual legal consequences, as opposed to what we've had so far, with a tight-lipped Mueller and a handful of vocal Dems like Schiff largely drowned out by the Dumpster's shameless enablers and propagandists.
steele said @ 10:12pm GMT on 20th Apr [Score:2]
C18H27NO3 said @ 3:25pm GMT on 21st Apr
And he returned the favor during the regular election by sitting on his hands or campaigning for her like wet cardboard. I can't believe people still think bernie would have won.
bbqkink said @ 1:41am GMT on 21st Apr
This has a lot more to do with 2020 than 16. This is a way to keep pressure on Trump/Russia without the candidates having to bring it up...it will become background noise. Lets hope the candidates will take the offer end shut up about Trump and run on local issues in 18...I'm not Trump doesn't work...if 16 showed us anything.
C18H27NO3 said @ 3:22pm GMT on 21st Apr
The russia thing has been background noise for a almost two years. Nothing has happened. If they can narrow the guilty parties to a handful, it won't really have an effect in general elections. It'll make a difference in the house, though. If dumpster is impeached and removed, I predict riots and violence.

Just read that the dumbfuck fundraiser that paid a playmate $1.6M and got her to abort, offered a russian gas giant to get their name off the sanctions list for $26M.

https://theintercept.com/2018/04/20/elliott-broidy-trump-russia-sanctions/
bbqkink said[1] @ 6:34pm GMT on 21st Apr
You are skipping over 2018.

And no doubt in my mind he is guilty in a lot of areas, but the investigation is not done.

Here this might explain it better than I can. It starts out on a possible firing of Rosenstien, it seems Sessions is growing a set.
Then it explains the story on civil suits in politics.

DNC files lawsuit against Trump camp, others over 2016 hack
knumbknutz said @ 2:46pm GMT on 21st Apr
Legal adviser warns Trump that Michael Cohen could flip on him

A longtime legal adviser to President Trump says he's warned the president that his attorney Michael Cohen would turn against him and end up cooperating with federal prosecutors should he face criminal charges stemming from a raid of documents found in his home, office and hotel room. In an interview with CBS News' Andy Triay, Jay Goldberg, a lawyer who represented Mr. Trump through much of the 1990's and early 2000's in real estate and divorce proceedings, confirmed the president had called him last Friday, and he told the president that he should have concerns about Cohen. Cohen has been under criminal investigation for months over his personal business dealings.
Fish said @ 5:31pm GMT on 21st Apr [Score:-1 Boring]
filtered comment under your threshold
C18H27NO3 said[1] @ 7:23pm GMT on 21st Apr [Score:1 Insightful]
When you say mainstream media, I assume you include all the right wing media outlets, right? That means fauxnewz, brietbastards, and SINingClaire.

Right? Or are they the only ones telling the "truth."
Fish said @ 5:31pm GMT on 21st Apr [Score:-1 Boring]
filtered comment under your threshold
bbqkink said @ 11:07pm GMT on 21st Apr
Discovery is going to be fantastic.

I'll be damned we finale agree on something. You do realize who is being sued here right?

Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment, then click the reply link on that comment instead]

You must be logged in to comment on posts.



Posts of Import
Karma
SE v2 Closed BETA
First Post
Subscriptions and Things

Karma Rankings
ScoobySnacks
HoZay
Paracetamol
lilmookieesquire
Ankylosaur