Friday, 3 November 2017

DNAinfo and Gothamist Are Shut Down After Vote to Unionize

quote [ Reporters and editors at the local news sites joined a union last week. On Thursday, their billionaire owner closed the sites. ]

Money speaks for money, the Devil for his own

Reveal
A week ago, reporters and editors in the combined newsroom of DNAinfo and Gothamist, two of New York City’s leading digital purveyors of local news, celebrated victory in their vote to join a union.

On Thursday, they lost their jobs, as Joe Ricketts, the billionaire founder of TD Ameritrade who owned the sites, shut them down.

At 5 p.m., a post by Mr. Ricketts went up on the sites announcing the decision. He praised them for reporting “tens of thousands of stories that have informed, impacted and inspired millions of people.” But he added, “DNAinfo is, at the end of the day, a business, and businesses need to be economically successful if they are to endure.”

All other articles promptly vanished from the sites; an official at DNAinfo said they would be archived online.

Mr. Ricketts wrote that he founded DNAinfo in 2009 “because I believe people care deeply about the things that happen where they live and work,” and he thought he could build “a large and loyal audience that advertisers would want to reach.” DNAinfo and Gothamist, which Mr. Ricketts bought in the spring, attracted more than 9 million readers a month, in New York and other cities where they operate satellite sites, DNAinfo said.

Continue reading the main story
RELATED COVERAGE

Gothamist and DNAinfo Newsrooms Now Have a Union OCT. 27, 2017

DNAinfo Buys Gothamist, With Plans to Merge Local Websites MARCH 8, 2017
RECENT COMMENTS

Rima Regas 6 minutes ago
It is going to take a steely resolve from consumers to stop being patrons of oligarchs who are making us bend to their will, one by one....
boggypeak 54 minutes ago
Now Mr. Ricketts won't have pickets.
GrandMastaGrimace 54 minutes ago
So a Republican Billionaire and Trump Super-pac donor ($1 Million+), Joe Rickets buys the most progressive online journalistic voice in New...
SEE ALL COMMENTS WRITE A COMMENT
But in the financially daunting era of digital journalism, there has been no tougher nut to crack than making local news profitable, a lesson Mr. Ricketts, who lost money every month of DNAinfo’s existence, is just the latest to learn. In New York City, the nation’s biggest media market, established organizations such as The Village Voice, The Wall Street Journal and The Daily News have slashed staff or withdrawn from street-level reporting. The Voice stopped publishing its print edition in September.

For DNAinfo and Gothamist, the staff’s vote to join the Writers Guild of America East was just part of the decision to close the company. A spokewsoman for DNAinfo said in a statement, “The decision by the editorial team to unionize is simply another competitive obstacle making it harder for the business to be financially successful.”

The decision puts 115 journalists out of work, both at the New York operations that unionized and at those in Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco and Washington that did not. They are getting three months of paid “administrative leave” at full salary, plus four weeks of severance, DNAinfo said.

The news took the newsroom by surprise. David Colon, a reporter for Gothamist, said that a lawyer for DNAinfo was present when the staff was told, but that he “didn’t really” take questions.

“Very classy,” Mr. Colon said. “I yelled a lot and somebody told me to stop. Now we’re all trying to figure out what to do.”

Merging DNAinfo and Gothamist was intended to ease some of the financial strain. But the two sites were an odd mix. DNAinfo specialized in street-level reporting on neighborhood issues not covered in other media, including real estate developments and crime. Last year, the staff’s coverage of an East Village explosion was a finalist for a prestigious Deadline Club award. Gothamist brought a puckish attitude to articles that were sometimes original, sometimes based on news published elsewhere.
Ben Fractenberg, who joined DNAinfo in 2010, said that the hope was that as local newspapers around the country foundered, DNAinfo would create “a new business model” for local news. “We were all united on that,” Mr. Fractenberg said. “And that never wavered.”

But the profits never materialized.

Journalism in general has become less profitable as print advertising, which commanded high prices, has crashed, and revenues from digital advertising have not replaced it. Local newspapers and sites, which deliver smaller audiences for advertisers, have been particularly pressed. The New York Times has also cut back on its local coverage of New York City, closing regional bureaus, for example.

Patch, a network of hyperlocal news sites that started two years before DNAinfo in 2007, is one relatively bright spot on the local-news landscape. It says it is now profitable, after cutting more than three-quarters of its staff in 2014 and deciding to duplicate much of its content across more than 1,000 local sites. Patch also changed its advertising policies to sell space more efficiently.

The city also has its share of locally owned neighborhood sites, including West Side Rag and Tribeca Citizen in Manhattan, Bklyner in Brooklyn and Sunnyside Post in Queens. West Side Rag’s founder said the site is profitable.

When the DNAinfo and Gothamist New York newsrooms first moved to join the union in April, management warned that there might be dire consequences.

DNAinfo’s chief operating officer sent the staff an email wondering if a union might be “the final straw that caused the business to close.” Around the same time, Mr. Ricketts, whose family owns the Chicago Cubs, wrote, “As long as it’s my money that’s paying for everything, I intend to be the one making the decisions about the direction of the business.”

In September, Mr. Ricketts, a conservative who supported President Trump in last year’s election, raised the ante with a post on his blog titled “Why I’m Against Unions At Businesses I Create,” in which he argued that “unions promote a corrosive us-against-them dynamic that destroys the esprit de corps businesses need to succeed.”

But reporters at many digital news sites make only a fraction of what staffers made in the heyday of print newspapers. And in joining the Writers Guild of America East, which has organized staffs at some larger digital organizations, including Vice and HuffPost, the DNAinfo and Gothamist staffers hoped for stability and recognition.

Emma Whitford, a Gothamist reporter, said that organizers from the union assured the workers that threats to shut the sites down were just “textbook union-busting tactics.”

The union said in a statement: ”It is no secret that threats were made to these workers during the organizing drive. The Guild will be looking at all of our potential areas of recourse and we will aggressively pursue our new members’ rights.”
After last week’s vote, one DNAinfo reporter, Katie Honan, said, “If this is the future of journalism, it should be a career for people, not a postcollege hobby.”

When the email from Mr. Ricketts landed, “it hit the newsroom like a thunderclap,” said Scott Heins, a Gothamist reporter. “At Gothamist we feel as if the choices made to merge are what set us on this path. I’m very adamant that the union didn’t kill DNAinfo and Gothamist, Joe Ricketts made the decision to kill Gothamist and DNAinfo.”

[SFW] [business] [+6]
[by ScoobySnacks@12:07amGMT]

Comments

damnit said @ 12:46am GMT on 3rd Nov
This has also affected The DCist. Also gone
Morris Forgot his Password said @ 3:05pm GMT on 3rd Nov
I have worked for quite a few media outlets that went under...and that was before the digital age.

In the end, if the business is not sustainable, it dies.
It is very very hard to make money in digital media using paid professionals and offering to quality content. Crap sites that pay nothing for bullshit clickbait, that's where the money is.
C18H27NO3 said @ 5:15pm GMT on 4th Nov
So the suggestion that an owner who has publicly expressed his distaste for unions shut down the business because they unionized is false. He was an ardent dumpster supporter, and the gothamist is outwardly liberal in a very liberal city.
Adam said @ 1:59am GMT on 7th Nov
I wonder what the NLRB will do with this. Threatening to close a business to prevent employees from unionizing is illegal. It doesn't matter if it's his money, my money, or Santa Claus's money that pays to keeps the lights on, employees have the legal right to unionize if they choose to do so.

Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment, then click the reply link on that comment instead]

You must be logged in to comment on posts.



Posts of Import
Karma
SE v2 Closed BETA
First Post
Subscriptions and Things

Karma Rankings
ScoobySnacks
HoZay
Paracetamol
lilmookieesquire
Ankylosaur