endopol said @ 1:10am GMT on 6th January
Failed quests:
1. Conception, Rx, me
2. Conception, aw, shift
Possible teams of baddies:
{conception} x {daffy, *me, *Rx, *shift}
{Rx, me} x {aw, shift}
* Denotes a pairing that would require a lucky split.
Now, assuming that no baddie will attempt a lucky split unless they had to (e.g. it's the fourth quest and there is only one fail), and that all other motives are opaque (including voting--this gives them less credit than they are due, but otherwise I can't say anything about this) only {conception} x {aw, shift} might have tried to pull this off. In which case, there is a 0.5 chance of the current situation. Up to scale, the likelihood of each pair:
I'd recommend leaving Aw and shift out of the last quest.
endopol said @ 1:15am GMT on 6th January
Failed quests:
1. Conception, Rx, me
2. Conception, aw, shift
Possible teams of baddies:
{conception} x {daffy, *me, *Rx, *shift}
{Rx, me} x {aw, shift}
* Denotes a pairing that would require a lucky split.
Now, assuming that no baddie will attempt a lucky split unless they had to (e.g. it's the fourth quest and there is only one fail), and that all other motives are opaque (including voting--this gives them less credit than they are due, but otherwise I can't say anything about this) only {conception} x {aw, shift} might have tried to pull this off. In which case, there is a 0.5 chance of the current situation. Up to scale, the likelihood of each pair:
I'd recommend leaving Aw and shift out of the last quest.
<-- Entry / Current Comment endopol said @ 1:10am GMT on 6th January
Failed quests:
1. Conception, Rx, me
2. Conception, aw, shift
Possible teams of baddies:
{conception} x {daffy, *me, *Rx, *shift}
{Rx, me} x {aw, shift}
* Denotes a pairing that would require a lucky split.
Now, assuming that no baddie will attempt a lucky split unless they had to (e.g. it's the fourth quest and there is only one fail), and that all other motives are opaque (including voting--this gives them less credit than they are due, but otherwise I can't say anything about this) only {conception} x {aw, shift} might have tried to pull this off. In which case, there is a 0.5 chance of the current situation. Up to scale, the likelihood of each pair: