NVIDIA GEFORCE RTX 2080 Ti Founders Edition -
Upgrade your gaming rig
|
Friday, 16 February 2018
quote [ The indictment says that the defendants allegedly, by early to mid 2016, were "supporting the presidential campaign of then-candidate Donald J. Trump." ]
Can't wait for more "No one has proof the Russians were involved... even though every intelligence agency has said they did and who cares, it doesn't matter any way."
|
Taxman said @ 1:04pm GMT on 18th February
So, arguably, there is no time limit on addendums. If something came up on your top secret clearance (for example) that you didn’t disclose, the investigating agency would approach you directly about it. You could deny it, amend your submission, or ask for time to “get the answers”. No matter what choice you make, a note is made about how the information did not match up. If the mismatch is a crime, the investigation stops there, clearance revoked. If the information is in a grey area, or would require deeper investigation by, I don’t know, a federal financial investigative agency. Then they would make you sign, one way or another, that this information is about you or it’s not. The important part being that signature admitting “this information we found is about you, correct?”.
On a side note it would be terrible, just awful, if you were ever in court and the prosecution had a signed document stating you were involved in potential crime. I think the AUSA’s call it a ‘slam dunk’. Them and their crazy lingo.
So anyways, the only reason you would need to be worried about your job is if your manager, director, or boss was concerned about these failures to disclose (they’re being reported to him/her). Oh, or if that federal investigative agency got involved, that would probably not be a good sign at all.
“The Internal Revenue Service and Justice Department have issued subpoenas to lenders and investors in real estate projects managed by Kushner’s family, Bloomberg reported Thursday, seeking information from people who lent money for Kushner Cos. projects in New York and New Jersey. According to Bloomberg, that likely stems from a separate investigation than the ongoing FBI probe into possible ties between Russia and Trump’s team.“
Come to think of it, it would be really terrible if you linked yourself (via disclosure) to something you would prefer not to be linked to at a later date.
Taxman said @ 1:04pm GMT on 18th February
So, arguably, there is no time limit on addendums. If something came up on your top secret clearance (for example) that you didn’t disclose, the investigating agency would approach you directly about it. You could deny it, amend your submission, or ask for time to “get the answers”. No matter what choice you make, a note is made about how the information did not match up. If the mismatch is a crime, the investigation stops there, clearance revoked. If the information is in a grey area, or would require deeper investigation by, I don’t know, a federal financial investigative agency. Then they would make you sign, one way or another, that this information is about you or it’s not. The important part being that signature admitting “this information we found is about you, correct?”.
On a side note it would be terrible, just awful, if you were ever in court and the prosecution had a signed document stating you were involved in potential crime. I think the AUSA’s call it a ‘slam dunk’. Them and their crazy lingo.
So anyways, the only reason you would need to be worried about your job is if your manager, director, or boss was concerned about these failures to disclose (they’re being reported to him/her). Oh, or if that federal investigative agency got involved, that would probably not be a good sign at all.
“The Internal Revenue Service and Justice Department have issued subpoenas to lenders and investors in real estate projects managed by Kushner’s family, Bloomberg reported Thursday, seeking information from people who lent money for Kushner Cos. projects in New York and New Jersey. According to Bloomberg, that likely stems from a separate investigation than the ongoing FBI probe into possible ties between Russia and Trump’s team.“
Come to think of it, it would be really terrible if you linked yourself (via disclosure) to something you would prefer not to be linked to at a later date.
<-- Entry / Current Comment
Taxman said @ 1:04pm GMT on 18th February
So, arguably, there is no time limit on addendums. If something came up on your top secret clearance (for example) that you didn’t disclose, the investigating agency would approach you directly about it. You could deny it, amend your submission, or ask for time to “get the answers”. No matter what choice you make, a note is made about how the information did not match up. If the mismatch is a crime, the investigation stops there, clearance revoked. If the information is in a grey area, or would require deeper investigation by, I don’t know, a federal financial investigative agency. Then they would make you sign, one way or another, that this information is about you or it’s not. The important part being that signature admitting “this information we found is about you, correct?”.
On a side note it would be terrible, just awful, if you were ever in court and the prosecution had a signed document stating you were involved in potential crime. I think the AUSA’s call it a ‘slam dunk’. Them and their crazy lingo.
So anyways, the only reason you would need to be worried about your job is if your manager, director, or boss was concerned about these failures to disclose (they’re being reported to him/her). Oh, or if that federal investigative agency got involved, that would probably not be a good sign at all.
“The Internal Revenue Service and Justice Department have issued subpoenas to lenders and investors in real estate projects managed by Kushner’s family, Bloomberg reported Thursday, seeking information from people who lent money for Kushner Cos. projects in New York and New Jersey. According to Bloomberg, that likely stems from a separate investigation than the ongoing FBI probe into possible ties between Russia and Trump’s team.“
Come to think of it, it would be really terrible if you linked yourself (via disclosure) to something you would prefer not to be linked to at a later date.
