Thursday, 9 February 2017

Prolonged silicon carbide integrated circuit operation in Venus surface atmospheric conditions:

I'm pretty sure anyone who understands this already knows about it, but having a computer that could operate on/in Venus is pretty neat-o.

TL;DR: Venus Rover Please

Abstract:
Reveal

Abstract

The prolonged operation of semiconductor integrated circuits (ICs) needed for long-duration exploration of the surface of Venus has proven insurmountably challenging to date due to the ∼ 460 °C, ∼ 9.4 MPa caustic environment. Past and planned Venus landers have been limited to a few hours of surface operation, even when IC electronics needed for basic lander operation are protected with heavily cumbersome pressure vessels and cooling measures. Here we demonstrate vastly longer (weeks) electrical operation of two silicon carbide (4H-SiC) junction field effect transistor (JFET) ring oscillator ICs tested with chips directly exposed (no cooling and no protective chip packaging) to a high-fidelity physical and chemical reproduction of Venus’ surface atmosphere. This represents more than 100-fold extension of demonstrated Venus environment electronics durability. With further technology maturation, such SiC IC electronics could drastically improve Venus lander designs and mission concepts, fundamentally enabling long-duration enhanced missions to the surface of Venus.


Reveal



The prolonged operation of semiconductor integrated circuits (ICs) needed for long-duration exploration of the surface of Venus has proven insurmountably challenging to date due to the ∼ 460 °C, ∼ 9.4 MPa caustic environment. Past and planned Venus landers have been limited to a few hours of surface operation, even when IC electronics needed for basic lander operation are protected with heavily cumbersome pressure vessels and cooling measures. Here we demonstrate vastly longer (weeks) electrical operation of two silicon carbide (4H-SiC) junction field effect transistor (JFET) ring oscillator ICs tested with chips directly exposed (no cooling and no protective chip packaging) to a high-fidelity physical and chemical reproduction of Venus’ surface atmosphere. This represents more than 100-fold extension of demonstrated Venus environment electronics durability. With further technology maturation, such SiC IC electronics could drastically improve Venus lander designs and mission concepts, fundamentally enabling long-duration enhanced missions to the surface of Venus.

Authoritative expert panel reports have described why improved understanding of Venus and its greenhouse effect atmosphere and geology has relevance to a better understanding of the Earth and solar system formation.1–4 Towards this end, these reports call for surface observations that will require prolonged-mission Venus landers, including long-term atmospheric and seismic activity data.
While long-term operation of silicon-based ICs has enabled years of useful Mars lander mission duration,1,5,6 achieving similar mission duration on the surface of Venus has proven an insurmountable challenge to date.5–8 Venus’ thick CO2-based atmosphere supports massive greenhouse warming and extreme physical conditions (∼460 °C, ∼ 94 MPa, above CO2’s critical point).7,9 Adding to the challenge is a caustic atmospheric chemistry containing enough SO2 (around ∼180 ppm at the surface) to form sulfuric acid cloud-decks many tens of kilometers thick.9 As these conditions fall well beyond the operating realm of silicon-based ICs,10,11 prior Venus landers and modern designs for future landers have employed pressure vessels and/or cooling systems to protect mission-critical IC electronics. These protection measures add substantial mass and mission expense, and are only effective for a few hours (2 hours, 7 minutes is the surface operation record set by Venera 13) before the surrounding Venus environment overcomes the protection and thermally fails the electronics with silicon ICs bringing end of mission.3,5–8
Other groups have reported short term (i.e., far less than 500 hours) T ≥ 460 °C Earth-atmosphere operation of SiC and III-N integrated circuits with single-level interconnect.12–23 Recently our group at NASA Glenn reported the fabrication and demonstration of 4H-SiC JFET integrated circuits (up to 24 transistors, with two levels of metal interconnect) and ceramic packaging that have consistently functioned for more than 1000 hours (41.7 days) at 500 °C in Earth-atmosphere oven-testing.24–26 Given these promising results, we decided to subject other chips diced from the same prototype IC wafer to electrical testing in simulated Venus surface atmospheric conditions inside the NASA Glenn Extreme Environments Rig (GEER).27 Ring oscillator chips were selected for the first such test, as these ICs can be operated using the fewest number of wires (one signal output in addition to +VDD, GND, and -VSS chip DC power inputs), are a recognized standard for logic IC demonstration, and provide harmonic output signals that can be detected in frequency spectrum even in the presence of substantial expected electrical noise and output signal path attenuation. Two NASA Glenn fabricated SiC JFET ring oscillator ICs residing on separate chips were selected for testing in GEER: a 3-stage ring oscillator and an 11-stage ring oscillator that are further described in the supplementary material and elsewhere.24–26,28
Two electrical feedthrough probe assemblies that are further described in the supplementary material were custom-built to enable operational testing of these chips exposed to simulated Venus surface atmosphere in GEER. Each probe assembly nominally provided four outside-chamber electrical connections to the SiC IC chip inside the chamber. The limited number of available test ports on the GEER chamber, limited space and number wires in the first custom feedthrough probe design, and lengthy processes of probe construction, pressure qualification, and safety approval were all factors that combined to restrict the sample size for this first feasibility test to just two SiC ICs. Figure 1 shows the inside-chamber end of one such probe assembly at various stages of the experiment. Fig. 1(a) shows the mounting and wiring of the 3 mm x 3 mm 11-stage SiC JFET ring oscillator IC chip almost ready for testing. Electrical signals were routed through mineral insulated cable comprised of four Nickel 201 (alloy) wires separated by crushed magnesium oxide ceramic insulation material inside an Inconel 600 jacket, sealed at both ends by multiple cycles of manually applying and curing Ferro 1180A high temperature glass. The subsequently installed cover with wire-mesh screen seen in Fig. 1(b) permitted simulated Venus atmosphere immersion of the chip, wire bonds, die attach, and ceramic substrate during the test, whilst protecting these from physical damage during feedthrough probe handling and mounting. Prior to simulated Venus surface conditions testing, both feedthrough probes with chips were operationally qualified 1) in Earth-atmosphere 460 °C to 480 °C tube oven for over 47 hours, and 2) installed in GEER under nitrogen atmosphere of 460 °C and 9.0 MPa for 56 hours.
figure
FIG. 1. Annotated photographs documenting the chip-containing end of the 11-stage ring oscillator feedthrough probe assembly at various stages of this study. (a) Nearly-completed assembly showing the 3 mm x 3 mm 11-stage SiC ring oscillator chip attached to ceramic substrate and fiberglass-sleeved wiring bundle prior to any heated testing. (b) Completed assembly prior to heated testing showing the mesh screen cap that permits chip immersion in simulated Venus atmosphere during the test. (c) After 21.7 days of simulated Venus surface conditions testing following removal of the mesh screen cap. (d) During clip-lead electrical testing conducted with the chip disconnected/isolated from the short-circuited feedthrough by removal of the nickel alloy wires.

Two 4-conductor cables (more than 14 m long) routed through safety wall bulkheads electrically connected each chip/probe assembly to computer-controlled instruments. As discussed in the supplementary material, the setup greatly attenuates measured oscillator IC output signals to varying degree that depends upon a number of experimental factors, including oscilloscope probe loading, cable parasitics and length, IC output signal frequency and impedance, and electrical parasitics of the custom-built feedthroughs. However, since the IC output buffers largely isolate the critical feedback ring circuit loop, oscillator output frequencies are much less affected by these varying off-chip signal path conduction factors. A dual-output supply provided VDD = +24 V and VSS = −24 V DC power to both chips for all the testing in GEER. Two computer-controlled relays, each residing between respective feedthrough probe VDD cable wire inputs and the VDD power supply output terminal, were inserted to facilitate independent powering and measurement of each oscillator as well as measurement of “power-off” background noise waveforms. More information on the GEER vessel and experimental procedures is in the supplementary material.
Figure 2 summarizes the experimental test results as a function of time in simulated Venus surface atmospheric conditions. Figure 2(a) shows the measured GEER chamber pressure and temperature. The reference time t = 0 hours corresponds to GEER arriving at 460 °C and 9.4 MPa pressure with the simulated Venus surface atmospheric composition. 521 hours (21.7 days) of simulated Venus surface conditions testing time were accumulated before facility scheduling forced test conclusion. Measurements for some of the pre-testing ramp-up and post-testing cool-down are included in Fig. 2 plots, showing expected oscillation frequency dependence on temperature.29 The oscillation frequency ratio between the two ICs differs somewhat from the 11 to 3 ratio that would be expected based solely on number of signal feedback loop gates/stages, but further study is required to firmly ascertain the reasons behind this discrepancy.
figure
FIG. 2. SiC ring oscillator IC testing data summary as a function of time in Venus surface atmospheric conditions. (a) Recorded GEER vessel temperature (red, solid) and pressure (blue, dashed). (b) Measured SiC ring oscillator IC output signal frequencies. The 3-stage SiC JFET ring oscillator IC (top trace, purple) functioned at 1.26 ± 0.05 MHz over the entire 521 hours (21.7 days) it was exposed to Venus surface atmospheric conditions. The 11-stage ring oscillator IC (bottom trace, green) functioned at 245 ± 5 kHz for 109 hours, after which output signal degraded and was lost at 161 hours; however, as shown in Fig. 4(b), this IC was later verified fully functional following post-test disconnection from its electrical feedthrough that short-circuited during Venus conditions testing. Data from some of the pre-test heat-up and post-test cool-down is also shown.
Figure 2(b) shows the measured oscillation frequencies of the two ICs throughout the Venus conditions testing. As seen in Fig. 2(b) and Fig. 3, the 3-stage ring oscillator IC functioned at 1.26 ± 0.06 MHz for the entire 521 hour (21.7 days) duration in simulated Venus surface conditions. This time of IC operation in Venus surface atmospheric conditions is more than 100-fold longer than what has been previously demonstrated 1) without a protective enclosure or cooling and 2) on actual Venus landers with heavily cumbersome electronics-protection measures.5,7 “Power off” control waveforms recorded throughout the testing confirmed that no oscillation signal was present unless the corresponding VDD relay was closed to properly power the IC, as illustrated by the example waveforms shown in Fig. 3(a) and resulting Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) magnitude spectra shown in Fig. 3(b). The measured amplitude of the 3-stage ring oscillator signal, impacted by substantial signal path attenuation, varied from 2.4 mVrms to 6.2 mVrms over the course of the test.
figure
FIG. 3. Three-stage ring oscillator IC output signal recorded at 521 hours of simulated Venus surface conditions operation. (a) 10 μsec window of waveform data measured with 3-stage oscillator VDD powered (VDD relay closed, solid red) and unpowered (VDD relay open, dashed blue). (b) Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) magnitude spectra calculated from full recorded waveforms, illustrating that fundamental (1.21 MHz) and third-order harmonic (3.63 MHz) FFT peaks are present only when the 3-stage SiC ring oscillator is properly powered with the VDD relay closed (solid red) and not present when the VDD relay is open (dashed blue). The IC output signal amplitude is substantially attenuated by feedthrough and cabling between the chip and the measurement oscilloscope, but the amount of attenuation could not be independently quantified during the Venus conditions testing.

The 11-stage ring oscillator IC functioned with excellent frequency and amplitude stability at 240 ± 10 kHz and 36 ± 2 mVrms for the first 109 hours of simulated Venus surface atmosphere testing. As shown in Fig. 4(a), there is negligible difference between measured oscillator output waveforms at t = 0 hours and t = 109 hours. However, starting at t = 111 hours, 11-stage oscillator output began to erratically exhibit significant instability superimposed on oscillation signals, and by t = 161 hours loss of 11-stage IC oscillation signal occurred. Over this same time period VSS power supply current increased from ∼ 0.7 mA at t = 109 hours to ∼ 4 mA at t = 161 hours. By t = 379 hours, the 200 mA power supply current limit was reached, even when the 11-stage VDD relay was open, which affected VSS supplied to the 3-stage oscillator by the same instrument. Therefore, all three power wires (VDD, GND, and VSS) leading to the 11-stage probe cable were removed and 11-stage probe data collection suspended for the remainder of testing in GEER.
Although the 11-stage ring oscillator IC functioned in Venus surface atmospheric conditions far longer than any ICs reported prior to this work, it is important to understand why this chip did not function as long as the 3-stage ring oscillator IC. Following post-test temperature and pressure ramp down, the feedthrough probe assemblies were removed from GEER for further study. Fig. 1(c) shows the post-test appearance of the chip end of the 11-stage probe following mesh cap removal. While significant discoloration is apparent compared to Fig. 1(a) pre-test appearance, the SiC IC chip, ceramic substrate, wire bonds, wiring, and fiberglass insulation sleeves appeared intact. Current-voltage (I-V) measurements, conducted prior to this feedthrough’s removal from GEER and repeated following Fig. 1(c) mesh cap removal, revealed that all four 11-stage probe electrical input/output connections were short-circuited to each other with less than 5 Ω resistance. The four nickel alloy feedthrough wires emerging from the glass seal were then removed as seen in Fig. 1(d), electrically disconnecting the 11-stage ring oscillator from the rest of the feedthrough probe assembly. However, additional I-V measurements after nickel wire removal showed the feedthrough input/output connections remained short-circuited, proving that short-circuits resided in the feedthrough electrical path prior to the ceramic substrate and 11-stage oscillator chip.
As shown in Fig. 1(d), electrical test leads were then clipped to remaining gold substrate wires to facilitate independent measurement of the 11-stage oscillator IC following its disconnection from the short-circuited feedthrough. The resulting Fig. 4(b) measured oscillator waveform proved that the 11-stage oscillator IC remained functional following the 521 hour exposure to simulated Venus surface conditions. The 980 kHz oscillation frequency was 14% from the 860 kHz pre-test oscillation signal recorded prior to first heating on GEER. Thus, it is understood that for both SiC ICs tested in GEER, the ring oscillator circuits themselves remained in full working order as of the conclusion of the 21.7 day test in Venus surface atmospheric conditions.
The post-test measurements independently verified that substantial changes to some feedthrough electrical connection properties occurred during the Venus atmospheric testing. The feedthroughs are undergoing further study to understand the degradation. Feedthroughs with consistent immunity to Venus atmospheric exposure and ability to handle more electrical connections with higher signal fidelity are desired for future IC tests in GEER.

This study marks the first reported demonstration of multi-day/week semiconductor IC functionality in Venus surface atmospheric conditions without pressure vessel, cooling, or other means protecting chips from the scorching caustic environment. We are presently striving to upscale the Venus-durable SiC JFET IC technology towards hundreds of transistors per chip circuit complexity. Such level of integration would be comparable to the complexity of IC chips used in mankind’s first wave of solar system exploration launched prior to 1978, including the highly successful NASA Viking Mars landers.30 Elimination of heavily cumbersome electronics sheltering measures (e.g., pressure vessels and cooling systems) while simultaneously extending IC surface operating time to weeks or months should drastically alter the hardware and approach to Venus surface exploration and fundamentally change what can be considered in future Venus mission concepts. With concurrent maturation of other Venus-lander technologies, we believe that further-developed SiC JFET ICs will play a mission-enabling role in the first landers to return weeks of important science data from the surface of Venus.
SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL


See supplementary material for additional experimental information on the SiC JFET ring oscillator ICs, chip mounting and connections, electrical measurements, and Venus environment chamber (GEER).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS


We thank D. Vento, J. Rymut, M. Arnett, K. Gregg, M. Krasowski, D. Lukco, G. Costa, M. Perez, R. Buttler, G. Beheim, C. Chang, N. Prokop, T. Kremic, G. Landis, M. Smith, K. Moses, J.Gonzalez, M. Mrdenovich, J. Wrbanek, L. Arnett, and L. Matus at The NASA Glenn Research Center. We thank R. Harvey at Case Western Reserve University for his manuscript review and improvement suggestions. Work conducted by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) at The John H. Glenn Research Center in Cleveland, Ohio USA, under funding from the NASA Planetary Instrument Concepts for the Advancement of Solar System Observations (PICASSO) program.

References


1. S. W. Squyres et al., Vision and Voyages for Planetary Science in the Decade 2013-2022 (The National Acadamies Press, Washington, DC, 2011). https://doi.org/10.17226/13117 Google Scholar CrossRef
2. R. Herrick et al., Goals, Objectives, and Investigations for Venus Exploration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, 2014), http://www.lpi.usra.edu/vexag/reports/GOI-140625.pdf. Google Scholar
3. J. L. Hall et al., Final Report of the Venus Science and Technology Definition Team, Venus Flagship Mission Study (NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, 2009), http://vfm.jpl.nasa.gov/files/Venus+Flagship+Mission+Study+090501-compressed.pdf. Google Scholar
4. D. Stevenson et al., Probing the Interior Structure of Venus (Keck Institute for Space Studies, Pasadena, CA, 2015), http://www.kiss.caltech.edu/study/venus/. Google Scholar
5. E. Kolawa et al., Extreme Environment Technologies for Future Space Science Missions (NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, Pasadena, CA, 2007),http://vfm.jpl.nasa.gov/files/EE-Report FINAL.pdf. Google Scholar
6. E. Kowala, M. Mojarradi, and L. Del Castillo, in Extreme Environment Electronics, edited by J. D. Cressler and H. A. Mantooth (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2013), Chap. 2, pp. 11–22. Google Scholar
7. A. T. Basilevsky and J. W. Head, Rep. Prog. Phys. 66, 1699 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1088/0034-4885/66/10/R04 Google Scholar CrossRef
8. J. Cutts et al., Venus Technology Plan (National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Washington, DC, 2014), http://www.lpi.usra.edu/vexag/reports/Venus-Technology-Plan-140617.pdf. Google Scholar
9. M. A. Bullock and D. H. Grinspoon, in Comparative Climatology of Terrestial Planets, edited by S. J. Mackwell, A. A. Simon-Miller, J. W. Harder, and M. A. Bullock (University of Arizona Press, Tuscon, AZ, 2013), pp. 19–54. Google Scholar
10. P. G. Neudeck, R. S. Okojie, and L. Chen, Proc. IEEE 90, 1065 (2002).. https://doi.org/10.1109/JPROC.2002.1021571 Google Scholar CrossRef
11. J. A. Pellish and L. M. Cohn, in Extreme Environment Electronics, edited by J. D. Cressler and H. A. Mantooth (CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 2013), Chap. 6, pp. 49–58. Google Scholar
12. A. C. Patil, F. Xiao-An, M. Mehregany, and S. L. Garverick, in 2009 IEEE Custom Integrated Circuits Conference, San Jose, California USA, 13-16 September 2009 (IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey, 2009), pp. 73–76. https://doi.org/10.1109/CICC.2009.5280889 Google Scholar CrossRef
13. S. Chia-Wei, A. C. Patil, S. L. Garverick, F. Xiaoan, and M. Mehregany, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 33, 1369 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2012.2206792 Google Scholar CrossRef
14. D. B. Slater, Jr., L. A. Lipkin, G. M. Johnson, A. V. Suvorov, and J. W. Palmour, in 53rd Annual Device Research Conference Digest, Charlottesville, Virgina USA, 19-21 June 1995 (IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey, 2009), pp. 100–101. https://doi.org/10.1109/DRC.1995.496288 Google Scholar CrossRef
15. C.-P. Chen, R. Ghandi, L. Yin, X. Zhu, L. Yu, S. Aurthur and P. Sandvik, in 2104 International Conference on High Temperature Electronics, Albuquerque, New Mexico USA, 13-15 May 2014 (IMAPS, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA, 2014), pp. 72–75. https://doi.org/10.4071/HITEC-TP14 Google Scholar CrossRef
16. M. Gaevski, J. Deng, G. Simin, and R. Gaska, in 2104 International Conference on High Temperature Electronics, Albuquerque, New Mexico USA, 13-15 May 2014 (IMAPS, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA, 2014), pp. 84–89. https://doi.org/10.4071/HITEC-TP16 Google Scholar CrossRef
17. R. Gaska, M. Gaevski, J. Deng, R. Jain, G. Simin, and M. Shur, in 2014 European Solid State Device Research Conference, Venice, Italy, 22-26 September 2014, edited by R.Bez, P.Pavan, and G.Meneghesso (IEEE, Piscataway, New Jersey, USA, 2014), pp. 142–145. https://doi.org/10.1109/ESSDERC.2014.6948778 Google Scholar CrossRef
18. P. Alexandrov, X. Li, M. O’Grady, and J. Hostetler, in 2104 International Conference on High Temperature Electronics, 13-15 May 2014, Albuquerque, New Mexico USA (IMAPS, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina USA, 2014),pp. 61–65. https://doi.org/10.4071/HITEC-TP12 Google Scholar CrossRef
19. S. Kargarrazi, L. Lanni, S. Saggini, A. Rusu, and C. M. Zetterling, IEEE Trans. Electron Dev. 62, 1953 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1109/TED.2015.2417097 Google Scholar CrossRef, CAS
20. L. Lanni, B. G. Malm, M. Ostling, and C. M. Zetterling, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 34, 1091 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2013.2272649 Google Scholar CrossRef, CAS
21. R. Hedayati, L. Lanni, S. Rodriguez, B. G. Malm, A. Rusu, and C. M. Zetterling, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 35, 693 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2014.2322335 Google Scholar CrossRef, CAS
22. S. Kargarrazi, L. Lanni, and C. M. Zetterling, Materials Science Forum 821-823, 897 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.821-823.897 Google Scholar CrossRef
23. L. Lanni, B. G. Malm, M. Östling, and C. M. Zetterling, Materials Science Forum 821-823, 910 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/MSF.821-823.910 Google Scholar CrossRef
24. D. J. Spry, P. G. Neudeck, L. Chen, D. Lukco, C. W. Chang, and G. M. Beheim, IEEE Electron Device Lett. 37, 625 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1109/LED.2016.2544700 Google Scholar CrossRef
25. D. J. Spry et al., in 2016 International High Temperature Electronics Conference, Albuquerque, New Mexico USA, 10-12 May 2016 (IMAPS, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2016), pp. 249–256. https://doi.org/10.4071/2016-HITEC-249 Google Scholar CrossRef
26. L. Chen, P. G. Neudeck, D. J. Spry, G. M. Beheim, and G. W. Hunter, in 2016 International High Temperature Electronics Conference, Albuquerque, NM, 10-12 May 2016 (IMAPS, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2016), pp. 66–72. https://doi.org/10.4071/2016-HITEC-66 Google Scholar CrossRef
27. See https://geer.grc.nasa.gov for more information about GEER; accessed 1 September 2016. Google Scholar
28. P. G. Neudeck, D. J. Spry, and L. Chen, in IMAPS 2016 International High Temperature Electronics Conference, Albuquerque, NM, 10-12 May 2016 (IMAPS, Research Triangle Park, NC, 2016), pp. 263–271. https://doi.org/10.4071/2016-HITEC-263 Google Scholar CrossRef
29. P. Neudeck, M. Krasowski, and N. Prokop, ECS Transactions 41, 163 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1149/1.3631494 Google Scholar CrossRef, CAS
30. J. E. Tomayko, in Supp. 3 ofEncyclopedia of Computer Science and Technology, edited by A. Kent and J. G. Williams (Marcel Dekker, New York, 1987), pp. 135–204, Vol. 13, http://history.nasa.gov/computers/Part2.html. Google Scholar
All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
[NSFW] [science & technology] [+4 Interesting]
[by lilmookieesquire@6:18amGMT]

Comments

midden said @ 6:36am GMT on 9th Feb
Silicon carbide is some tough stuff, used as an abrasive and even as military armor. I never thought it would be used for ICs, but it makes sense that it would be a perfectly good semiconductor.
5th Earth said @ 6:57am GMT on 9th Feb
Why NSFW?
Bob Denver said @ 7:52am GMT on 9th Feb [Score:1 Insightful]
There once was a woman from Venus...
captainstubing said @ 10:33am GMT on 10th Feb
Was she a friend of the woman from Punt
Who could pick up a pencil with her...or not?

Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment, then click the reply link on that comment instead]

You must be logged in to comment on posts.



Posts of Import
Karma
SE v2 Closed BETA
First Post
Subscriptions and Things

Karma Rankings
ScoobySnacks
HoZay
Paracetamol
lilmookieesquire
Ankylosaur