|
Sunday, 31 March 2019
quote [ "Individual liberty and freedom are not outmoded concepts," San Diego-based U.S. District Judge Roger Benitez wrote as he declared unconstitutional the law that would have banned possessing any magazines holding more than 10 bullets. ]
This does not mean you can put a normal sized 30rd Magazine on a featureless rifle because it still becomes an Assault Weapon under California law by virtue of being able to hold more then 10rds.
|
Comments
 |
avid said @ 1:20am GMT on 1st Apr
[Score:1 Insightful]
The "common sense" argument why you shouldn't ban high-capacity magazines is that bad guys can reload, so it doesn't really make a difference.
Then this court case strikes down a high-capacity ban because threatened homeowners can't put the phone down to reload. Seems like it's not a great argument if it can be used to defend both sides of the issue. |
|
backSLIDER said @ 3:27am GMT on 8th Apr
Update the AG asked the Judge for a stay and he granted it effective Friday the 5th minus making owning the magazines illegal. My rough estimate is 30 million magazines were sold to Californians in the last week.
|
Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment,
then click the reply link on that comment instead]You must be logged in to comment on posts.
