Lies My Teacher Told Me -
Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong
|
Thursday, 1 February 2018
quote [ Pornstars: Ryan Driller, Stormy Daniels
Categories: Blonde, Hardcore, MILF, Pornstar, HD Production: Professional Tags: wickedpictures, fake tits, wicked, milf, mother, mom, cock sucking, heels, stocking, nylons, big tits, big boobs, blonde, office, reality ] The pornstar preferred by presidents. She is now denying allegations of a sexual affair.
Stormy Daniels is now denying her affair with Trump. Here's how she's confirmed it before.
Jimmy Kimmel’s FULL INTERVIEW with Stormy Daniels
|
Taxman said @ 5:02am GMT on 3rd February
Well Clinton hasn’t been tried by a jury of his peers, so everything is an allegation. And if your fine with allegations equaling 100% guilty in Clinton’s case, I’m sure you wouldn’t commit a logical fallacy by saying the same doesn’t apply to the current president.
As of December he was up to 19 women.
Glad we cleared that up.
Even if consensual, the president should let the American voter know so that they can make an informed decision about wether they want a polyamourous president in office. Again, it would be a logical fallacy to have conservative outlets write so many articles about Clinton being a cheating scumbag, and THEN saying that trump and his wife get to keep that private, because... well fish is ok with it.
You keep saying the Russia narrative has fallen apart and I’m glad you live in a country that lets you hold whatever opinion you want.
I don’t have people. I just go to work, come home, and go back.
The federal agencies are made up of both liberals and conservatives. I know the idea of conspiracies where (for some unknown reason) we all get together, actually work together, to take down partisan enemies is “cool”; it wouldn’t work in practice. I mean if a manager came and said “ok everyone, we’re taking down the president” (regardless of who’s in office) wouldn’t the people (I know I know, we’re not people, we’re government) of the different/opposite political parties IMMEADIATLY go to the press?
Taxman said @ 5:04am GMT on 3rd February
Well Clinton hasn’t been tried by a jury of his peers, so everything is an allegation. And if you’re fine with allegations equaling 100% guilty in Clinton’s case, I’m sure you wouldn’t commit a logical fallacy by saying the same doesn’t apply to the current president.
As of December he was up to 19 women.
Glad we cleared that up.
Even if consensual, the president should let the American voter know so that they can make an informed decision about wether they want a polyamourous president in office. Again, it would be a logical fallacy to have conservative outlets write so many articles about Clinton being a cheating scumbag, and THEN saying that trump and his wife get to keep that private, because... well fish is ok with it.
You keep saying the Russia narrative has fallen apart and I’m glad you live in a country that lets you hold whatever opinion you want.
I don’t have people. I just go to work, come home, and go back.
The federal agencies are made up of both liberals and conservatives. I know the idea of conspiracies where (for some unknown reason) we all get together, actually work together, to take down partisan enemies is “cool”; it wouldn’t work in practice. I mean if a manager came and said “ok everyone, we’re taking down the president” (regardless of who’s in office) wouldn’t the people (I know I know, we’re not people, we’re government) of the different/opposite political parties IMMEADIATLY go to the press?
Taxman said @ 5:07am GMT on 3rd February
Well Clinton hasn’t been tried by a jury of his peers, so everything is an allegation. And if you’re fine with allegations equaling 100% guilty in Clinton’s case, I’m sure you wouldn’t commit a logical fallacy by saying the same doesn’t apply to the current president.
As of December he was up to 19 women.
Oh, and a consensual porn star. (See above)
Glad we cleared that up.
Even if consensual, the president should let the American voter know so that they can make an informed decision about wether they want a polyamourous president in office. Again, it would be a logical fallacy to have conservative outlets write so many articles about Clinton being a cheating scumbag, and THEN saying that trump and his wife get to keep that private, because... well fish is ok with it.
You keep saying the Russia narrative has fallen apart and I’m glad you live in a country that lets you hold whatever opinion you want.
I don’t have people. I just go to work, come home, and go back.
The federal agencies are made up of both liberals and conservatives. I know the idea of conspiracies where (for some unknown reason) we all get together, actually work together, to take down partisan enemies is “cool”; it wouldn’t work in practice. I mean if a manager came and said “ok everyone, we’re taking down the president” (regardless of who’s in office) wouldn’t the people (I know I know, we’re not people, we’re government) of the different/opposite political parties IMMEADIATLY go to the press?
<-- Entry / Current Comment
Taxman said @ 5:02am GMT on 3rd February [Score:-2]
Well Clinton hasn’t been tried by a jury of his peers, so everything is an allegation. And if you’re fine with allegations equaling 100% guilty in Clinton’s case, I’m sure you wouldn’t commit a logical fallacy by saying the same doesn’t apply to the current president.
As of December he was up to 19 women.
Oh, and a consensual porn star. (See above)
Glad we cleared that up.
Even if consensual, the president should let the American voter know so that they can make an informed decision about wether they want a polyamourous president in office. Again, it would be a logical fallacy to have conservative outlets write so many articles about Clinton being a cheating scumbag, and THEN saying that trump and his wife get to keep that private, because... well fish is ok with it.
You keep saying the Russia narrative has fallen apart and I’m glad you live in a country that lets you hold whatever opinion you want.
I don’t have people. I just go to work, come home, and go back.
The federal agencies are made up of both liberals and conservatives. I know the idea of conspiracies where (for some unknown reason) we all get together, actually work together, to take down partisan enemies is “cool”; it wouldn’t work in practice. I mean if a manager came and said “ok everyone, we’re taking down the president” (regardless of who’s in office) wouldn’t the people (I know I know, we’re not people, we’re government) of the different/opposite political parties IMMEADIATLY go to the press?
