Do you want to dig up a T-Rex? -
Why didn't anyone tell me excavation kits are a thing?
quote [ Pornstars: Ryan Driller, Stormy Daniels
Categories: Blonde, Hardcore, MILF, Pornstar, HD
Production: Professional
Tags: wickedpictures, fake tits, wicked, milf, mother, mom, cock sucking, heels, stocking, nylons, big tits, big boobs, blonde, office, reality ]
[NSFW] [pr0n] |
|
|
[by
JWWargo]
|
|
|
|
Taxman said @ 12:28pm GMT on 2nd February
Hey, didn’t conservatives previously try to impeach a president for having an adulterous sexual relationship and lying about it?
No, Bill Clinton's impeachment was for perjury, and for his crimes against Paula Jones, for which he paid $950,000 in fines and surrendered his law license.
Perjury and obstruction were the only things mentioned in the articles of impeachment. Crimes against Paula Jones, 950k in fines, and the loss of his law license weren't mentioned at all.
But you knew that.
You Clinton/Obama lovers are about to witness the unmasking of a criminal enterprise the likes of which this country has never seen.
I find it fascinating that you have no faith in the government (criminal enterprise) and at the same time full faith in that same government to "unmask" itself.
And I'll say it right now: I told you so.
Ah the humblest of brags. For it can apply to anything you want it to, and if you're just flat out wrong... well who remembers right?
Oh Fish, so angry, but at least you try right?
Taxman said @ 12:49pm GMT on 2nd February
Hey, didn’t conservatives previously try to impeach a president for having an adulterous sexual relationship and lying about it?
No, Bill Clinton's impeachment was for perjury, and for his crimes against Paula Jones, for which he paid $950,000 in fines and surrendered his law license.
Perjury and obstruction were the only things mentioned in the articles of impeachment. Crimes against Paula Jones, 950k in fines, and the loss of his law license weren't mentioned at all.
But you knew that.
You Clinton/Obama lovers are about to witness the unmasking of a criminal enterprise the likes of which this country has never seen.
I find it fascinating that you have no faith in the government (criminal enterprise) and at the same time full faith in that same government to "unmask" itself.
And I'll say it right now: I told you so.
Ah the humblest of brags. For it can apply to anything you want it to, and if you're just flat out wrong... well who remembers right?
Oh man, and I had to edit this because I forgot:
Are you admitting you believe he actually did this? (You told us we should be giving him high fives)
/
Taxman said @ 12:28pm GMT on 2nd February [Score:-1]
Hey, didn’t conservatives previously try to impeach a president for having an adulterous sexual relationship and lying about it?
No, Bill Clinton's impeachment was for perjury, and for his crimes against Paula Jones, for which he paid $950,000 in fines and surrendered his law license.
Perjury and obstruction were the only things mentioned in the articles of impeachment. Crimes against Paula Jones, 950k in fines, and the loss of his law license weren't mentioned at all.
But you knew that.
You Clinton/Obama lovers are about to witness the unmasking of a criminal enterprise the likes of which this country has never seen.
I find it fascinating that you have no faith in the government (criminal enterprise) and at the same time full faith in that same government to "unmask" itself.
And I'll say it right now: I told you so.
Ah the humblest of brags. For it can apply to anything you want it to, and if you're just flat out wrong... well who remembers right?
Oh man, and I had to edit this because I forgot:
Are you admitting you believe he actually did this? (You told us we should be giving him high fives)