Lies My Teacher Told Me -
Everything Your American History Textbook Got Wrong
quote [ Millions of children from poor families who excel in math and science rarely live up to their potential—and that hurts everyone. ]
[SFW] [people] |
[+6 Underrated] |
|
[by
raphael_the_turtle]
|
|
|
|
norok said @ 12:35am GMT on 6th December
The article completely encapsulates it's argument in the nurture side of development theory. It skips past little tid bits like, "Children whose parents have patents in a specific field—say, antennas—are also likely to patent in exactly the same field as their parents did" without addressing the question... to paraphrase your tagline... do good chickens lay good eggs?
norok said @ 12:38am GMT on 6th December
The article completely encapsulates it's argument in the nurture side of development theory. It skips past little tid bits like,
-"Children whose parents have patents in a specific field—say, antennas—are also likely to patent in exactly the same field as their parents did"
and
"suggesting that it’s factors in a child’s earlier life" (before fully effected by the environment)
without addressing the question... to paraphrase your tagline... do good chickens lay good eggs?
norok said @ 12:42am GMT on 6th December
The article completely encapsulates it's argument in the nurture side of development theory. It skips past little tid bits like,
-"Children whose parents have patents in a specific field—say, antennas—are also likely to patent in exactly the same field as their parents did"
and
"suggesting that it’s factors in a child’s earlier life" (before fully effected by the environment)
without addressing the question... to paraphrase your tagline... do good chickens lay good eggs?
But that's not surprising, given the source, which skirts around the lessons of the failure of the Head Start program with a title like The Never-Ending Struggle to Improve Head Start that obfuscates the real discovery that by the 3rd grade there was not discernible difference in development.
norok said @ 12:43am GMT on 6th December
The article completely encapsulates it's argument in the nurture side of development theory. It skips past little tid bits like,
-"Children whose parents have patents in a specific field—say, antennas—are also likely to patent in exactly the same field as their parents did"
and
"suggesting that it’s factors in a child’s earlier life" (before fully effected by the environment)
without addressing the question... to paraphrase your tagline... do good chickens lay good eggs?
But that's not surprising, given the source, which skirts around the lessons of the failure of the Head Start program with a title like The Never-Ending Struggle to Improve Head Start that obfuscates the real discovery that by the 3rd grade there was no discernible difference in development of children.
/
norok said @ 12:35am GMT on 6th December [Score:-3 Old]
The article completely encapsulates it's argument in the nurture side of development theory. It skips past little tid bits like,
-"Children whose parents have patents in a specific field—say, antennas—are also likely to patent in exactly the same field as their parents did"
and
"suggesting that it’s factors in a child’s earlier life" (before fully effected by the environment)
without addressing the question... to paraphrase your tagline... do good chickens lay good eggs?
But that's not surprising, given the source, which skirts around the lessons of the failure of the Head Start program with a title like The Never-Ending Struggle to Improve Head Start that obfuscates the real discovery that by the 3rd grade there was no discernible difference in development of children.