|
Saturday, 13 September 2025
quote [ In 2009, law professors David A. Hoffman and Salil K. Mehra published a paper analyzing conflicts like these on Wikipedia and noted something unusual. Wikipedia’s dispute resolution system does not actually resolve disputes. In fact, it seems to facilitate them continuing forever.
These disputes may be crucial to Wikipedia’s success ] Here's the more controversial piece from 2015 by game dev turned internet philosphy advisor Chris Bateman, whose own bio was taken down shortly after publishing his take:
(web.archive.org of Typepad, which is due to die) and an even older talk from Jason Scrott on the impossibility of neutrality:
I know there was more from him on the topic, but I can't find it.
|
Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment,
then click the reply link on that comment instead]You must be logged in to comment on posts.
Extended: older critique on Wikipedia itself, that seems a bit dated by now but points out the impossibility of measuring importance by comittee.
Note also: you can help the Archive Team by scraping Typepad.