Citations Needed -
A podcast about the media, power, PR, and the history of bullshit.
quote [ Many of these men (and women, too) would never admit that their hatred of Clinton was linked to her gender. She?s untrustworthy, they said?more so than a candidate who openly, compulsively lies more than any other candidate in recent memory. She?s corrupt, she has baggage, she?s shrill, she?s cold. Clinton was far from a perfect candidate, and there were lots of level-headed reasons to disagree with her. But it?s hard to look at the surplus of pure contempt lobbed at her over the years and not attribute it at least partly to the fact that she?s a woman. ]
[SFW] [politics] |
[0 Overrated] |
|
[by
eidolon]
|
|
|
|
C18H27NO3 said @ 7:43pm GMT on 13th March
I totally disagree. Logic will tell you that what you are putting in is garbage, therefore your conclusion will be garbage. It's like a geometric proof or a trigonometry problem. You fuck up basic math and the answer will be wrong, regardless if you followed all the necessary steps. If someone puts garbage into logic, it's not logic. The limitations you highlight are flaws in human cognition, influenced by emotion. Emotion has not place in logic.
C18H27NO3 said @ 7:44pm GMT on 13th March
I totally disagree. Logic will tell you that what you are putting in is garbage, therefore your conclusion will be garbage. It's like a geometric proof or a trigonometry problem. You fuck up basic math and the answer will be wrong, regardless if you followed all the necessary steps. If someone puts garbage into logic, it's not logic. The limitations you highlight are flaws in human cognition, influenced by emotion. Emotion has no place in logic.
/
C18H27NO3 said @ 7:43pm GMT on 13th March
I totally disagree. Logic will tell you that what you are putting in is garbage, therefore your conclusion will be garbage. It's like a geometric proof or a trigonometry problem. You fuck up basic math and the answer will be wrong, regardless if you followed all the necessary steps. If someone puts garbage into logic, it's not logic. The limitations you highlight are flaws in human cognition, influenced by emotion. Emotion has no place in logic.