Cancer and Evolution

Anger - Wisdom for Cooling the Flames

Subscriber Link - click here to make yours.

Wednesday, 18 January 2017

quote [ Evolutionary theory “makes sense” of cancer, giving us critical insight into how it works. This has become particularly clear in recent years. Now, we can sequence all the genes in a patient’s cancer, and see how they change over time as cancer evolves. Cancer evolves with the same evolutionary mechanisms that drive the evolution of new species. ]

Quick fix to a re-post. Full text of NYT Chelsea Manning article still in extended, by request.

Full original article text:

Reveal

Chelsea Manning to Be Released Early as Obama Commutes Sentence

By CHARLIE SAVAGEJAN. 17, 2017

WASHINGTON — President Obama on Tuesday commuted all but four months of the remaining prison sentence of Chelsea Manning, the Army intelligence analyst convicted of a 2010 leak that revealed American military and diplomatic activities across the world, disrupted Mr. Obama’s administration and brought global prominence to WikiLeaks, the recipient of those disclosures.

The decision by Mr. Obama rescued Ms. Manning, who twice tried to kill herself last year, from an uncertain future as a transgender woman incarcerated at the men’s military prison at Fort Leavenworth, Kan. She has been jailed for nearly seven years, and her 35-year sentence was by far the longest punishment ever imposed in the United States for a leak conviction.

At the same time that Mr. Obama commuted the sentence of Ms. Manning, a low-ranking enlisted soldier at the time of her leaks, he also pardoned Gen. James E. Cartwright, the former vice chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff who pleaded guilty to lying about his conversations with reporters to F.B.I. agents investigating a leak of classified information about cyberattacks on Iran’s nuclear program.

The two acts of clemency were a remarkable final step for a president whose administration carried out an unprecedented criminal crackdown on leaks of government secrets. Depending on how they are counted, the Obama administration has prosecuted either nine or 10 such cases, more than were charged under all previous presidencies combined.

In addition, Mr. Obama on Tuesday commuted the sentence of Oscar Lopez Rivera, who was part of a Puerto Rican nationalist group that carried out a string of bombings in the late 1970s and early 1980s; the other members of that group had long since been freed. Mr. Obama also granted 63 other pardons and 207 other commutations, mostly for drug offenders.

Under the terms of the commutation announced by the White House on Tuesday, Ms. Manning is set to be freed on May 17 of this year rather than in 2045. A senior administration official said the 120-day delay was part of a standard transition period for commutations to time served, and was designed to allow for such steps as finding a place for Ms. Manning to live after her release.

The commutation also relieved the Defense Department of the difficult responsibility of Ms. Manning’s incarceration as she pushes for treatment for her gender dysphoria, including sex reassignment surgery, that the military has no experience providing.

But the move was sharply criticized by several prominent Republicans, including the chairmen of the House and Senate armed services committees, Representative Mac Thornberry of Texas and Senator John McCain of Arizona, who called her leaks “espionage” and said they had put American troops and the country at risk.

Speaker Paul D. Ryan called it “outrageous.” “President Obama now leaves in place a dangerous precedent that those who compromise our national security won’t be held accountable for their crimes,” he said in a statement.

But in a joint statement, Nancy Hollander and Vince Ward — two lawyers who have been representing Ms. Manning in appealing her conviction and sentence, and who filed the commutation application — praised the decision.

“Ms. Manning is the longest serving whistleblower in the history of the United States,” they said. “Her 35-year sentence for disclosing information that served the public interest and never caused harm to the United States was always excessive, and we’re delighted that justice is being served in the form of this commutation.”

In recent days, the White House had signaled that Mr. Obama was seriously considering granting Ms. Manning’s commutation application, in contrast to a pardon application submitted on behalf of the other large-scale leaker of the era, Edward J. Snowden, the former intelligence contractor who disclosed archives of top-secret surveillance files and is living as a fugitive in Russia.

Asked about the two clemency applications on Friday, the White House spokesman, Josh Earnest, discussed the “pretty stark difference” between Ms. Manning’s case for mercy and Mr. Snowden’s. While their offenses were similar, he said, there were “some important differences.”

“Chelsea Manning is somebody who went through the military criminal justice process, was exposed to due process, was found guilty, was sentenced for her crimes, and she acknowledged wrongdoing,” he said. “Mr. Snowden fled into the arms of an adversary and has sought refuge in a country that most recently made a concerted effort to undermine confidence in our democracy.”

Mr. Earnest also noted that while the documents Ms. Manning provided to WikiLeaks were “damaging to national security,” the ones Mr. Snowden disclosed were “far more serious and far more dangerous.” (None of the documents Ms. Manning disclosed were classified above the merely “secret” level.)

Ms. Manning was still known as Bradley Manning when she deployed with her unit to Iraq in late 2009. There, she worked as a low-level intelligence analyst helping her unit assess insurgent activity in the area it was patrolling, a role that gave her access to a classified computer network.

She copied hundreds of thousands of military incident logs from the Afghanistan and Iraq wars, which, among other things, exposed abuses of detainees by Iraqi military officers working with American forces and showed that civilian deaths in the Iraq war were probably much higher than official estimates.

The files she copied also included about 250,000 diplomatic cables from American embassies around the world showing sensitive deals and conversations, dossiers detailing intelligence assessments of Guantánamo detainees held without trial, and a video of an American helicopter attack in Baghdad in which two Reuters journalists were killed, among others.

She decided to make all these files public, as she wrote at the time, in the hope that they would incite “worldwide discussion, debates and reforms.” WikiLeaks disclosed them — working with traditional news organizations including The New York Times — bringing notoriety to the group and its founder, Julian Assange.

The disclosures set off a frantic scramble as Obama administration officials sought to minimize any potential harm, including getting to safety some foreigners in dangerous countries who were identified as having helped American troops or diplomats. Prosecutors, however, presented no evidence that anyone had been killed because of the leaks.

At her court-martial, Ms. Manning confessed in detail to her actions and apologized, saying she had not intended to put anyone at risk and noting that she had been “dealing with a lot of issues” at the time she made her decision.

Testimony at the trial showed that she had been in a mental and emotional crisis as she came to grips, amid the stress of a war zone, with the fact that she was not merely gay but had gender dysphoria. She had been behaving erratically, including angry outbursts and lapsing into catatonia midsentence. At one point, she had emailed a photograph of herself in a woman’s wig to her supervisor.

Prosecutors said that because the secret material was made available for publication on the internet, anyone, including Al Qaeda, could read it. And they accused Ms. Manning of treason, charging her with multiple counts under the Espionage Act, as well as with “aiding the enemy,” a potential capital offense, although they said they would not seek her execution.

Ms. Manning confessed and pleaded guilty to a lesser version of those charges without any deal to cap her sentence. But prosecutors pressed forward with a trial and won convictions on the more serious versions of those charges; a military judge acquitted her of “aiding the enemy.”

In her commutation application, Ms. Manning said she had not imagined that she would be sentenced to the “extreme” term of 35 years, a term for which there was “no historical precedent.” (There have been only a handful of leak cases, and most sentence are one to three years.)

After her sentencing, Ms. Manning announced that she was transgender and changed her name to Chelsea.

The military, under pressure from a lawsuit filed on her behalf by Chase Strangio of the American Civil Liberties Union, has permitted her to partly transition to life as a woman, including giving her cross-sex hormones and letting her wear women’s undergarments and light cosmetics.

But it has not let her grow her hair longer than male military standards, citing security risks, and Ms. Manning said she had yet to be permitted to see a surgeon about the possibility of sex reassignment surgery.

Until recently, the military discharged transgender soldiers. In June, Secretary of Defense Ashton B. Carter changed that policy and said the military would instead provide treatment for them, eventually including such surgery if doctors said it was necessary.

But President-elect Donald J. Trump mocked that change as excessively “politically correct,” raising the possibility that he will rescind it.

Even if he does, Ms. Manning will soon no longer be subject to the military’s control.

[SFW] [science & technology]	[+4 Interesting]
[by midden@2:25amGMT]

Comments

kylemcbitch said @ 2:27am GMT on 18th Jan

Thank you Chelsea, I appreciate your sacrifice on behalf of the American people. You still deserve to be in prison, however.

HoZay said @ 2:35am GMT on 18th Jan

Seven years ought to be enough.

kylemcbitch said @ 2:43am GMT on 18th Jan

I don't know, people could have died. I am not sure I believe reports that people did die due to it. I can think of no such crime as attempted involuntary manslaughter, but 10 years seems a bit more like it.

midden said @ 2:55am GMT on 18th Jan

I think an argument could be made that many lives have been lost over less important, but still necessary things. I certainly don't know the calculus of lives for information, but there clearly are times when it's worth it.

HoZay said @ 3:13am GMT on 18th Jan

It's been pretty shitty time she's been serving, too. Sort of torture-like at times.

Morris Forgot his Password said @ 6:07am GMT on 18th Jan

While I tend to view Manning and Snowdon as criminals if not treasonous criminals, I have more compassion for Manning in light of the transgender thingy. I am not going on record as saying transgender is a mental illness, but being trans and living in the wrong gender is a mind fuck of the nth degree so whichever comes first, chicken or egg, is moot.

That being said, that bitch was probably fucked in the head at the time so not guilty by reason of insanity.

Snowdon could be tossed out of a Hercules at 25,000 feet over the North Atlantic and I wouldn't give a flying fuck...

kylemcbitch said @ 7:04am GMT on 18th Jan

I don't disagree that transgender people suffer immensely, I don't believe Manning's being transgender had any bearing on what she did. I'd like to think that integrity transcends such things.

But as such, that also means it really shouldn't be part of the consideration.

cakkafracle said @ 4:54pm GMT on 18th Jan

What he just said in a nutshell is "She's transgender so of course she's mentally unstable enough to do something crazy like treason"

not sure I'd legitimize it with a response

Morris Forgot his Password said @ 1:57am GMT on 26th Jan [Score:1 laz0r]

If that is how you feel, then she should be hung. Obviously not well hung, that crazy train left the station.

Morris Forgot his Password said @ 2:02am GMT on 26th Jan

But since you got it wrong, I will say it again, slower. Manning committed treason, before he transitioned. Being in the wrong gender, buggers the brain, I have no doubt there was inner turmoil when the former Bradley Manning committed treason. Manning (the current one) is on a path to healing.

If there were no extenuating circumstances, Bradley Manning should face execution.... (although Chelsea might object)

cakkafracle said @ 4:27am GMT on 26th Jan

I got it right just fine.

midden said @ 2:43am GMT on 18th Jan

Well, that's for judges and juries and sometimes Presidents to decide.

kylemcbitch said @ 2:44am GMT on 18th Jan

Indeed it is, I could honest understand the argument from either side.

midden said @ 2:50am GMT on 18th Jan

One of the great things about our legal system, when it's working, is that there remains room for extenuating circumstances. Laws are not intended to be absolute. Manning absolutely committed acts legally punishable by long term incarceration, but that does not mean that she necessarily should be.

kylemcbitch said @ 2:57am GMT on 18th Jan

Agreed. I suppose I'd be far more impressed/pissed off if Snowden was pardoned.

sanepride said @ 3:03am GMT on 18th Jan

So does that mean you think he deserves to be in prison as well?

kylemcbitch said @ 3:15am GMT on 18th Jan [Score:1 Interesting]

In the case of Snowden, it's the same basic concept as Manning only to even more extremes. The amount of information Snowden gave us about thing we should have the right to know is infuriatingly impressive. That said, he did actual quantifiable harm... though admittedly mostly by way of informing terrorist how they were fucking up and we were able to spy on them.

midden said @ 6:05am GMT on 18th Jan

I think he deserves a fair trial by his peers. They can decide if he should be in prison or not. Granted, trying to find a truly unbiased jury would be difficult.

midden said @ 3:14am GMT on 18th Jan

The Pres makes a good argument that Manning actually went through the justice system, while Snowden has not. I could see him pardoned after receiving a conviction.

Headlessfriar said @ 3:26am GMT on 18th Jan

Gerald Ford didn't wait until Nixon went to trial. I'm not sure why that's a needed step now.

midden said @ 3:36am GMT on 18th Jan

True, but Ford had very different motivation for pardoning Nixon. It wasn't at all about whether or not he deserved it, it was about keeping the country from getting bogged down with Nixon when it had a lot of other pressing issues to deal with. And Ford did catch an awful lot of flack for it.

sanepride said @ 3:59am GMT on 18th Jan

It's commonly accepted that the pardoning was a bargain of sorts, arranged between Ford and Nixon. It isn't clear when it was made exactly, but the quid pro quo was that Nixon would resign in exchange for the pardon, elevating Ford to the Presidency.
And yes, Ford did catch flack for it, as he should have.

midden said @ 6:00am GMT on 18th Jan

Yes, I'm not saying it was right, but that it wasn't about deserving a pardon, as is argued in the cases of Manning and Snowden. It was definitely a negotiated way out of what could have pulled the whole country down for months or years. Nixon wasn't pardoned for Nixon, he was pardoned for everyone else. I'm also pretty sure there were a lot more very powerful people involved in how that all went down than just Nixon and Ford.

sanepride said @ 6:25am GMT on 18th Jan

Nah, it was pretty much a deal between the two of them. Ford said at the time it was for the good of the country, but the fact is pretty much everyone else wanted to see Nixon face justice. One big reason why Ford got his ass handed to him in the '76 election.
Anyway it'll be interesting to see if Trump and Pence have a similar arrangement worked out.

hellboy said @ 7:20am GMT on 18th Jan

The President is mistaken if he thinks that makes any legal difference.

zarathustra said @ 8:53am GMT on 18th Jan

I don't read his statement as saying that he does. What it effects is his exercise of discretion.

midden said @ 1:36pm GMT on 18th Jan

Exactly. He was explaining his own reasoning, not legal justification. The legal justification is,"I'm the president and this is one of my legal powers and because I say so." The fact that he chose to share his ideas on the subject doesn't change that.

HoZay said @ 2:28am GMT on 18th Jan

Dude...

midden said @ 2:33am GMT on 18th Jan

Holy crap, how did I miss that?
updated post in three, two, one...

sanepride said @ 2:36am GMT on 18th Jan

Whatever you change it to, please keep the NYT article text, as it wasn't included in the original post.

midden said @ 2:38am GMT on 18th Jan

Will do. Edit #2 coming up.

1	ScoobySnacks
2	HoZay
3	Paracetamol
4	lilmookieesquire
5	Ankylosaur