Sunday, 11 May 2014
quote [ We didn't start out crazy, we're being driven crazy
ERROR: Attempted to parse HTML with regular expression; system returned Cthulhu. Funny, right? No? How about this exchange: "Is that called arrayReverse?" "s/camel/_/" "Cool thanks." Wasn't that guy helpful? With the camel? Doesn't that seem like an appropriate response? No? Good. You can still find Jesus. ] Given the headaches steele is having with the sandbox and other code-related muckity-muck, I thought this would be a good way for non-programmers (like me) to understand his travails and for resident code monkeys to have a chuckle or two.
|
steele said @ 8:32pm GMT on 11th May
[Score:5 Insightful]
|
mechavolt said @ 9:14pm GMT on 11th May
This is why I work at home as often as possible.
|
cb361 said @ 10:45pm GMT on 11th May
I forgot all this stuff twenty years ago.
|
donnie said @ 10:39pm GMT on 11th May
[Score:3]
Everyone knows you can't parse HTML with regex...
|
LurkerAtTheGate said @ 1:21pm GMT on 12th May
While looking for any easy way to validate if a user-input regex was at least syntatically correct, I came across one of those for "Can a regex validate a regex?" The argument that followed contained bits of various famous philosophers, and escalated to something akin to a fatwah.
All I was looking for was a parameter list & return type of preg_match(). |