Tuesday, 21 January 2020
quote [ One of two things is wrong with America: Either the entire system is broken or is on the verge of breaking, and we need someone to bring about radical, structural change, or — we don’t need that at all! Which is it? Who can say? Certainly not me, and that is why I am telling you now which candidate to vote for. ]
|
steele said @ 4:12am GMT on 21st Jan
|
ComposerNate said @ 11:34am GMT on 21st Jan
So Sanders would need not only overcome Fox/Russia but also ABC/CBS/NBC?
|
steele said[1] @ 2:58pm GMT on 21st Jan
[Score:1 Underrated]
Since day one. And don't forget the billionaires, the democratic establishment, Barack Obama, Hillary Clinton, the polling companies, NYT, WaPo, other media corps, the police and private prison industries, the healthcare industry, the fossil fuel industries, the military industrial complex, the pundits, and of course the "progressives" who think that a politician being gay or a woman is equivalent to a social and economic justice based platform.
|
ComposerNate said @ 10:11pm GMT on 21st Jan
Joe Rogan says he’s voting for Bernie Sanders
|
steele said @ 1:14am GMT on 22nd Jan
lol, yeah I saw. Shame I'm not on facebook anymore, number of people I would've liked to have seen the reactions to the news.
Meanwhile... #ILikeBernie Trends After Hillary Clinton Says 'Nobody Likes' Bernie Sanders Can't wait to see how much money this raises. |
steele said @ 2:10pm GMT on 22nd Jan
|
ComposerNate said @ 2:58pm GMT on 22nd Jan
If only Sanders could clear 10pts over Biden, he might actually be considered viable
|
steele said @ 6:12pm GMT on 22nd Jan
lmao. Don't worry, I'm sure after Sanders over performs the polling in Iowa the media will be unable to ignore the numbers and... lol, kidding they'll fudge the numbers just like they've been doing.
The only demographic keeping Biden towards the top right now is the 40+ vote, so we'll see what happens now that the gloves are coming off in regards to Biden's yearning for Social Security and Medicare cuts. |
steele said @ 7:54pm GMT on 22nd Jan
Seeing as how Sanders is currently polling in the lead in California, they must've gotten quite the backlash for them to actually do this. Still some bullshit tho.
|
ComposerNate said @ 9:04pm GMT on 22nd Jan
The realization that a news org should not be hosting crap online polls was snarky, but refreshingly self-aware
|
steele said @ 10:25pm GMT on 22nd Jan
I'd be surprised if they weren't aware of that beforehand.💁♂️😜
|
backSLIDER said @ 1:11am GMT on 22nd Jan
I'll hold my nose and vote for any of them except Bloomberg. I'm voting for Bernie or Pete depending on Iowa.
|
steele said @ 1:15am GMT on 22nd Jan
quote [ One of two things is wrong with America: Either the entire system is broken or is on the verge of breaking, and we need someone to bring about radical, structural change, or — we don’t need that at all! Which is it? Who can say? Certainly not me, and that is why I am telling you now which candidate to vote for. ]
|
zarathustra said @ 6:56am GMT on 22nd Jan
In any other election, Bloomberg is the only one that could keep me from voting a straight ticket. In this one, even if he is a racist piece of shit who doesn't give a crap about the Constitution he is at least not an idiot with the same qualities.
|
backSLIDER said @ 5:45pm GMT on 22nd Jan
If it came down to Bloomberg or Trump i would vote third party.
|
Episode 16 -- Editorial Boards: Protectors of Establishment Ideology by Citations Needed Podcast
Just your usual primary hilarity. Main WaPo article in extended.
Bonus: Mitten Rainbows