Friday, 12 April 2019

College Grads Sell Stakes in Themselves to Wall Street

quote [ Instead of taking out loans, students can agree to hand over part of their future earnings in return for investment. ]

I like this idea as an alternative to student loans which cannot be forgiven. People or companies invest in your future, and if it doesn't pan out you could end up owing nothing as it becomes the investor's risk.

Soft paywall, full article in extended.

Reveal
To pay for college, Amy Wroblewski sold a piece of her future. Every month, for eight-and-a-half years, she must turn over a set percentage of her salary to investors. Today, about a year after graduation, Wroblewski makes $50,000 a year as a higher education recruiter in Winchester, Va. So the cut comes to $279 a month, less than her car payment.

If the 23-year-old becomes a star in her field, she could pay twice as much. If she loses her job, she won’t have to pay anything, and investors will be out of luck until she finds work.

Wroblewski struck this unusual deal as an undergraduate at public Purdue University in West Lafayette, Ind. To fund part of the cost of her degree in strategy and organizational management, she sidestepped the common source of money, a student loan. Instead, she agreed to hand over part of her future earnings through a new kind of financial instrument called an income-sharing agreement, or ISA. In a sense, financiers are transforming student debtors into stock investments, with much of the same risk and, ideally, return.

In Wall Street terms, Wroblewski, a first-generation college student, is more small-company stock than Microsoft. Her mother works as a waitress; her father, as a quality control inspector in a car dealership’s body shop. With a strong work ethic, Wroblewski always held down at least two part-time jobs in school, working as a Purdue teaching assistant, a Target cashier, and an Amazon seasonal worker. Showing potential for leadership—not to mention earnings—she rose to vice president of Delta Sigma Pi, a business fraternity.

Those qualities impressed a company called Vemo Education, which vets students at Purdue and a handful of other schools on behalf of potential investors. More important, perhaps, Wroblewski believes in herself and her ability to make good on the contract. “Even with all my other loans, I knew I could make it work,” says Wroblewski.

Americans owe $1.5 trillion in higher education debt, a burden that weighs down their dreams and the U.S. economy. The Federal Reserve says millennials are now less likely to buy homes than young people were in 2005, and even senior citizens find themselves still making payments on their student loans. Wall Street sees the crisis as an opportunity. College graduates on average earn $1 million more over their lifetimes. Investors could capture some of that wage premium for themselves.

“I envision a whole new equity market for higher education in the next five years where today there’s only debt,” says Chuck Trafton, who runs hedge fund FlowPoint Capital Partners LP, which has invested in ISAs, including Purdue’s. ISA experts say they have fielded calls from some of the world's largest investment managers that are considering investing in the contracts. And Tony James, executive vice chairman of money manager Blackstone Group LP, formed the Education Finance Institute to help schools study and develop ISAs.

For now, the market for income-sharing agreements can be measured in the tens of millions, a tiny sum compared with the $170 billion in outstanding asset-backed securities created from student loans. Only some schools let outside investment firms buy a stake in students. Others seek out individual donors, mostly wealthy alumni, or use money from their own endowments.

Along with Purdue, which started its program in 2016, some smaller private schools such as Lackawanna College in Scranton, Pa., and Norwich University in Vermont are offering ISAs. The University of Utah recently announced a pilot plan.

ISAs raise all kinds of questions. How many students will lose their jobs and be unable to pay? How much should Wall Street demand as compensation for the risk? Investors typically ask for a smaller slice from students with more lucrative majors. At Purdue, for example, English majors borrowing $10,000 pay 4.52 percent of their future income over nearly 10 years; chemical engineers, 2.57 percent in a bit over seven years.

Purdue set up its program to be competitive with many student loans for the typical borrower. Consider a junior economics major who needs $10,000. Through a private loan, she’d likely pay $146 a month, or $17,576 over the course of 10 years. Through an ISA, a student with a starting salary of $47,000, Purdue’s estimate for its 2020 economics graduates, would pay $15,673, assuming 3.8 percent annual salary increases. That would be a good deal. But, if she found a $60,000-a-year job, she’d have to fork over $20,010.

Financial firms and for-profit colleges have been known to prey on college students’ financial naiveté to sell them high-priced private student loans, rather than steer them toward more favorable government-backed ones. While schools offering ISAs say they will offer them only after government loans with the most favorable terms are exhausted, some students may end up again with regrets.

“There’s a level of enthusiasm that’s overstated,” says Julie Margetta Morgan, a fellow who studies higher education at the Roosevelt Institute, a think tank focused on reducing income inequality. “It’s pretty darn near impossible to say whether an ISA is better or worse for an individual.” Morgan dislikes that ISAs require arbitration, which means students give up their right to sue in court.

The last big ISA experiment—at Yale University in the 1970s—ended up as a cautionary tale. Yale pooled all borrowers, and they owed the school a percentage of their incomes for 35 years, or until everyone paid back what they owed. The idea was that graduates who ended up with high-paying jobs in finance would subsidize those who chose public service.

But many students defaulted, leaving the remaining borrowers on the hook longer than they’d anticipated. Other wealthier students exited the pools via large one-time buyout payments. The remaining students tended to be lower-income. Some stopped paying altogether. Yale ultimately bailed out the borrowers, winding down the whole program in 2001.

Juan Leon, who sells business jets for Dassault Aviation SA, graduated from Yale in 1974 with a degree in urban studies. He borrowed $1,500 through the college’s “Tuition Postponement Option.” By the late 1990s, he’d paid back $8,000. “We didn’t read the fine print,” Leon says. “It was quite, quite onerous.”

Students have more protection under newer plans. Purdue, for example, caps total payments at 2.5 times what a student borrowed, so the most successful don’t feel gouged. And students making less than $20,000 a year won’t be charged at all, as long as they are working full time or seeking work. Those who are working part time or not seeking work will only have their payments deferred, which means that they’ll owe for a longer period of time.

Purdue has arranged more than 700 contracts worth $9.5 million and closed two investment funds totaling $17 million. David Cooper, Purdue’s chief investment officer, helped to develop the program and pitch it to investors after almost a decade of overseeing investments for Indiana’s retirement system. He says the funds are drawing more interest now that the oldest contracts have over 20 months of repayment data. “We feel like we’ve got the pricing for the students at a pretty good spot,” Cooper says. “At the same time, it’s a reasonable return for the investors.”

Purdue’s early funds attracted investments from wealthy individuals, as well as nonprofit Strada Education Network and INvestEd, a nonprofit lender and financial literacy organization in Indiana. Cooper says ISAs may make most sense for socially conscious investors, but he points out that even funds seeking lofty profits might one day be interested if they can juice returns with leverage.

Charlotte Hebert, 23, who graduated from Purdue in 2017, has mixed feelings about the $27,000 she took out from an ISA to pay for her senior-year costs. A professional writing major, she’s required to shell out 10 percent of her income for the term of the deal. That’s about 2.5 percentage points more than an engineer would pay. The daughter of a teacher and a nurse, she makes about $38,000 a year as a technical writer for an engineering firm in Lafayette, Ind.

She pays investors $312 a month. “I don’t think it’s the perfect solution,” Hebert says. “I am of the opinion that in a society where most of its workers need a college education, nobody should be paying this much to be what is considered a functional member of society.”
[SFW] [business] [+2]
[by JWWargo@1:06amGMT]

Comments

ComposerNate said @ 7:17am GMT on 12th Apr [Score:2 Underrated]
The US is brutal on students
mechavolt said[2] @ 1:45am GMT on 12th Apr
The version of this I like is funded through the schools, not the employers directly.

What I like about this is that it incentives colleges to be concerned about their students' success. The better the student does post-schooling, the more money the college recoups. However, I have a couple of concerns.

The first is that there would be a clear preference for higher earning degrees. While some might argue that's just realistic, I fear there's a risk that valuable degrees that don't pay well might be under-served.

The second is that this only works if the students graduate. I imagine that if they don't, they'd be on the hook for the entire cost. However, the graduation rate for higher education is surprisingly low. Though to be fair, this isn't a problem that's any worse than what's currently the case. But schools might focus on a smaller number of less risky students if the cost of helping less proficient students is too high for them.
zarathustra said @ 1:50am GMT on 12th Apr
It sounds interesting, but I would be curious to actually read the contract. Am I obligated to make the most money I can in my field or can I enter a lower paying branch ( for example decide I would rather use my law degree to work at a charitable clinic than in a big firm). What if I want to change majors or even do something completely outside my major after graduation.
JWWargo said @ 2:33am GMT on 12th Apr
Purdue, for example, caps total payments at 2.5 times what a student borrowed, so the most successful don’t feel gouged. And students making less than $20,000 a year won’t be charged at all, as long as they are working full time or seeking work. Those who are working part time or not seeking work will only have their payments deferred, which means that they’ll owe for a longer period of time.
zarathustra said[1] @ 3:18am GMT on 12th Apr
That doesn't address the questions I asked.
JWWargo said @ 4:21am GMT on 12th Apr
I believe it answers the first question. At least in the sense that if you use that Law degree to work full time for a charity and only make 20k a year, you won't have to pay anything back.
zarathustra said @ 4:42am GMT on 12th Apr
No. It does not say if the party has a duty to maximize return. If one can only find a 20k job, they may not have to pay it back. It says nothing about if they choose an under performing ( financially) job when they had other options. Do they or do they not have a duty to make an effort to maximize profits for their investors? While only finding a 20k job might when nothing else is offered to them may be fine. Choosing the 20k job while turning down a better paying one may not be.
JWWargo said @ 7:44am GMT on 12th Apr
That's not how I understood it to work. It's a percent of your earnings for a fixed period of time. So if you had a high paying job, yeah, you may end up paying more but, at least as Purdue has it set up, you won't pay more than 2.5 times over what you borrowed. To simplify things, take a 10k loan, graduate and get a 21k a year a job, repay the loan at 2 percent for 10 years, and if you somehow never get a raise or change jobs in that time, you'll end up paying 4.2k back. A loss for the investor. (Am I missing something here?)

Real world scenarios probably won't play like that, but I didn't see anywhere where investors had any leverage to push you into making larger payments. I think the really imoortant question is whether it turns out you pay more in the end than you would with a student loan.
zarathustra said @ 1:15am GMT on 13th Apr [Score:1 Informative]
I did a bit of research and it seems that the Purdue contract is written in pretty much the way you understand it with a bit of wiggle room regarding potential fraud in the application and that they determine what constitutes reasonable efforts to find a job when seeking deferment. There is some questionable stuff about your financial disclosures to them and how they may share it with others, but it does look overall pretty good.

My questions were mostly based on if this is to be characterized as a loan or a service contract or investment vehicle where you could have a fiduciary duty to maximize the investors return. While that is not the case here, a bill proposed by Rubio a couple of years ago ( I don't know if it got though) made it explicit that they recipient could not be penalized for their choice of work ( or lack theirof) implying that this could be a concern in such contracts.

On of the interesting things I came upon was a group offering such loans that combined it with mentoring. It makes sense that those investing in you might also make some effort to maximize their profit by helping you find a good job. ( Though again, in this case their might be some issues if they tried to make you work for them.)

Overall I would say this kind of arrangement looks good but approach with caution.
milkman666 said @ 10:48am GMT on 12th Apr
"John, this morning I received this list of demands from our workers. They are going to strike if we don't meet them."

"Woah woah woah, Peter! How did they even get organized?! We have procedures in place to..."

"One of our competitors bought out the ISA's for more than half of our workers. They either comply or they get term extensions and or penalties. They have to play ball. John, enough of the other workers are on board to make this happen."

"Which competitor?"

"You know which one."

*Both shaking fists and yelling into the ceiling in unison* "Marjorie!"
arrowhen said @ 4:05pm GMT on 12th Apr
Three pints of damn and a chaser of hell blast!
-_- said @ 5:24am GMT on 12th Apr
https://www.tor.com/2009/03/04/lemgthe-unincorporated-manlemgin-60-seconds/

Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment, then click the reply link on that comment instead]

You must be logged in to comment on posts.



Posts of Import
4 More Years!
SE v2 Closed BETA
First Post
Subscriptions and Things
AskSE: What do you look like?

Karma Rankings
ScoobySnacks
arrowhen
HoZay
lilmookieesquire
XregnaR