|
Thursday, 23 August 2018
quote [ When a flood of fake celebrity pornography generated by artificial intelligence (AI) technology surfaced on the internet earlier this year, most tech platforms were quick to ban these so-called deepfake clips. Folks at the adult entertainment company Naughty America, on the other hand, began looking into ways to make money with deepfakes. ]
But I gotta, know what-what's your fantasy
|
Comments
 |
mechanical contrivance said @ 12:51pm GMT on 23rd Aug
[Score:1 Good]
This isn't about She-Hulk porn?
|
|
lilmookieesquire said @ 5:43am GMT on 23rd Aug
Being John Malkovich
|
|
5th Earth said @ 1:12pm GMT on 23rd Aug
That won't end well.
|
|
foobar said @ 6:13am GMT on 23rd Aug
Can't see it actually being illegal, unless they say explicitly who it's supposed to be.
|
|
arrowhen said @ 7:54am GMT on 23rd Aug
It looks like it varies from state to state, but generally in the US individuals have the right to control commercial use of not only their name but their "image and likeness." I suspect at the very least we'll see aome interesting court cases arise from this.
|
|
foobar said @ 6:21pm GMT on 23rd Aug
So it's not a porn of Sarah Palin, it's staring the digital creation Parah Salin.
|
|
Hugh E. said @ 11:52am GMT on 23rd Aug
I thought this was an attempted +10 Illegal Pron.
|
|
milkman666 said[1] @ 2:41pm GMT on 23rd Aug
The rep for naughty America took exception to the use of the word deepfakes and this is kinda why. They are using the tech used in deepfakes to personalize porn. So you would commission a pornstar to be in your room, or have yourself overlayed on a pornstar. So part of the process is signing consent. Like arrowhen alluded to, the wrinkle will be if signing off on doing Backdoor Vixens 49 meant your footage from those scenes are fair game to be deepfaked into some dudes houseboat boudoir.
|
Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment,
then click the reply link on that comment instead]You must be logged in to comment on posts.
