Wednesday, 27 June 2018

L.A. visit by U.S. Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions sparks downtown protest, arrests

quote [ Dozens of protesters were gathering downtown Tuesday morning to demonstrate a visit by U.S. Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions to downtown Los Angeles, where he delivered an afternoon speech. ]

Do yourself a favor and visit the page, since this is actual journalism.

L.A. visit by U.S. Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions sparks downtown protest, arrests
By MELISSA ETEHAD, HAILEY BRANSON-POTTS and MICHAEL LIVINGSTON
JUN 26, 2018 | 4:55 PM

Dozens gathered outside the Millennium Biltmore Hotel, where U.S. Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions was speaking to a criminal justice organization, to protest for immigration reform.

Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions on Tuesday dismissed critics of the Trump administration’s immigration policies as open-borders advocates during a speech in downtown Los Angeles that drew hundreds of protesters.

“The rhetoric we hear from the other side on the issue, as on many others, has become radicalized,” Sessions said during a speech to a criminal justice organization. “We hear views on television today that are on the lunatic fringe, frankly.”

He was greeted warmly by the crowd inside the Millennium Biltmore Hotel, where he spoke. A man introducing Sessions to the audience assured him that he was “among friends today.”

Outside, it was a different story.

Dozens of demonstrators coalesced outside the hotel, while Los Angeles police officers and uniformed security guards stood at every entrance.

“The Biltmore is hosting Jeff Session [sic] A Kidnapper,” read a homemade sign held by 28-year-old Steven Martin near the hotel’s entrance on Olive Street.

“I have to stand in solidarity with immigrants,” Martin said. He joined other demonstrators in chanting, “Asylum, not prison!”

The protesters targeted Sessions because of the administration’s “zero tolerance” border enforcement policy that has led to thousands of immigrant children and parents in recent weeks being detained and separated indefinitely.

Earlier Tuesday morning, about 150 demonstrators — a mix of interfaith religious leaders and immigrant advocates — gathered outside a downtown federal courthouse, where they held hands and blocked traffic on Spring Street as they prayed.

About two dozen people, many of them members of the clergy wearing religious robes, were arrested.

“Kids belong at home! Not in cages!” they chanted.

Sandra Olewine, a 51-year-old pastor at First United Methodist Church in Pasadena, was the first person taken into custody. She had been seated in a line of people blocking the roadway. As she was led away in handcuffs, people cheered.

“Sometimes you have to break the law,” Olewine said minutes earlier. “We are sitting down for the children.”

Rabbi Jonathan Klein, who helped organized the protest, said demonstrating against Trump’s policies aligns directly with his faith.

“We are building a just and sacred society,” Klein said. “My faith says I have no choice but to be here.”

Klein said he felt the protest took on greater significance Tuesday morning after the U.S. Supreme Court upheld President Trump’s ban on foreign visitors and immigrants from several mostly Muslim-majority nations.

Linda Perez, a 68-year-old former secretary for the Los Angeles Unified Unified School District who wore a pin that said “Impeach Trump,” said she was compelled to protest because she sees herself in the parents and children affected by the administration’s border policies.

“That man is evil,” she said of Sessions. “He’s separating kids from families.”

“It could have been me,” added Perez, who emigrated from Mexico in 1994.

Los Angeles police Sgt. Barry Montgomery said he was happy the demonstration ended peacefully and that people were able to uphold their constitutional right to protest. But arresting faith leaders wasn’t easy for him, he said.

“I hated it,” Montgomery said. “But the roads were blocked, and we had to disperse them.”


Sandra Olewine, a senior pastor at First United Methodist Church in Pasadena, is arrested by Los Angeles police officers after sitting in the middle of Spring Street during a protest and rally against Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions. (Michael Owen Baker / For The Times)

1 / 9
Many of the Spring Street protesters regrouped outside the Millennium Biltmore, where the crowd grew throughout the morning. One woman held a sign reading “2000 Kids Still Separated.” Another read, “Give me your tired. Your poor. Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free.”

Jake Gideon, 42, of Pasadena said he was outraged by the separation of children from their families.

“They have been telling us who they are for years. Their racism wasn’t, like, a huge surprise for me,” he said. “But for them to do this to children is disgusting.”

Cheryl Jackson of Plano, Texas, knew nothing about the protest beforehand and was heading to an event to feed the homeless but made a U-turn in her car once she saw the crowd. She borrowed a microphone and condemned Sessions’ previous use of a Bible verse in defending the policy.

“The Bible says love our neighbor,” Jackson said. “Mexico is our neighbor, and we need to love them.”

In the hotel, Sessions received a friendly welcome from the Criminal Justice Legal Foundation, a conservative advocacy group that filed an amicus brief in support of the Trump administration’s lawsuit against California over its laws protecting immigrants in the country illegally.

In his half-hour speech, Session said critics of the administration’s hard-line policies wanted to stop all deportations and to have open borders.

“From coast to coast, perhaps especially on this coast, there are politicians who declare that having any border at all is mean-spirited,” Sessions said.

Many critics, he said, are people who “live in gated communities” and “are featured at events where you have to have an ID to even come in and hear them speak.”

“They like a little security around themselves, and if you try to scale the fence, believe me, they’ll be even too happy to have you arrested and separated from your children,” Sessions quipped, grinning.

The crowd laughed loudly and applauded.

“They want borders in their lives, but not in yours.”

Lamenting that, in 2015, Justice Department officials in the Obama administration unsuccessfully tried to modify a court settlement known as the Flores agreement — under which the federal government agreed to hold immigrant minors no longer than 20 days — Sessions said the “word got out” that “if you crossed our border illegally, you would not be detained as long as you brought a child with you.”

“Our broken immigration laws are telling people they can, in fact, come here illegally,” Sessions said. “Why wait in line? Why file your claim and wait your turn?”

Dozens of protesters block Spring Street in downtown Los Angeles on Tuesday morning to demonstrate a visit by U.S. Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions.
Dozens of protesters block Spring Street in downtown Los Angeles on Tuesday morning to demonstrate a visit by U.S. Atty. Gen. Jeff Sessions. (KTLA)

4:55 p.m.: This article was updated throughout, including details from Sessions’ speech.

12:10 p.m. This article was updated with an interview with Sgt. Montgomery and a protest outside the Millennium Biltmore Hotel.

10:45 a.m.: This article was updated with the arrests of demonstrators.

This article was originally published at 8:40 a.m.
[SFW] [politics] [+3 Good]
[by lilmookieesquire@12:53amGMT]

Comments

midden said @ 2:09am GMT on 27th Jun [Score:4 Insightful]
This is all so fucked up. It's so hard to know at what point things cross the line. At what point does a creampuff casper milk-toast © like myself wind up in a bunker with Thelonious Monk and a couple crates full of Molotov's instead of just walking down Pennsylvania Avenue with a well kerned foamcore sign? It's so fucked up that I should even have to ask myself that question. Am I becoming some tinfoil hat conspiracy nut job?

I so want to believe that, "a nation, conceived in liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal... or any nation so conceived, and so dedicated, can long endure."

Is it all just media hype? Is the system properly self correcting, as designed by some really smart people a couple hundred years ago? Will it all be ok? Or is our government truly off the rails, going to hell in a hand basket, as has happened more than once in the fairly recent past, among otherwise civilized western civilizations, resulting in incomprehensible levels of human suffering and true evil stalking the land?

And I'm a fucking atheist. I don't believe there is any higher power managing our shit. Mega props to those religious leaders in this article who have the balls to get arrested standing up for what is right, though. "You are a better man than I, Gunga Din!" But whatever happens, it will be because of what we, as individuals, taking personal responsibility, choose to do. There is no higher power safety net.

Part of me says, "For fuck's sake, take the high ground and be polite to even the most despicable enablers, like Huckabee Sanders. We are better than that." Another part of my says, "No. They have sacrificed human decency for power. They are to be reviled, shunned, and excoriated, pushed outside the circle of compassion, for the greater good of all humanity."

Could this shit actually deteriorate to the point where middle class, over educated, east coast liberals like me find ourselves physically resisting our government?

Christ, it's so surreal. I really, really hope I'm over reacting. I suppose it's only fair, though. We in the US have had an unusually long run of stability and security. It's probably time for some famine and piles of bodies in the streets again. I'm just not sure whether I'd rather be one of the bodies, or one of the people stacking them. (Yeah, that last bit is hopefully just hyperbole. But it wasn't for our grandparents.)

Fuck. Hit "post." Go to bed.
kylemcbitch said @ 6:37am GMT on 27th Jun [Score:1 Underrated]
Civility is for civilized people, not barbarians that throw children in cages after taking them from their mother or father.

"Asshole" is not a protected class of people, and no one has to serve them or even accept their presence in a private building if they don't want.

And as far as these protests being "harassment," what we are seeing in America is the very politics of harassment. A growing body of evidence suggest our president went with the "baby jail" plan to A) Rile up his base and B) get a reaction out of people like me who are bothered by this sort of thing so they can point to liberal boogeymen that want to let all the illegals in and throw parties.

Well assholes, here is our reaction.

Because, where I come from when adults start targeting and harassing children, we get a group of adults together and we throw their asses out of the park. These people are not special because they are high ranking public figures.

They need to learn that lesson, and I hope it is as socially painful for them as possible.
Ussmak said[1] @ 10:18pm GMT on 27th Jun
Those poor kids in cages.

Yet you fucks won't get riled up over the dams crumbling, the nuke plants faltering, the thousands of rotted airframes out there still being flown, the coming holy war with Islam, mass surveillance, giant human trafficking rings running unopposed, pharmaceutical malfeasance, democratic collusion with terrorists, and a whole host of other far more pertinent concerns.

And then to top it all off, you silly fucks actually think you'll be able to put up a fight if things legitimately devolve into open violence.

Good luck with that.
kylemcbitch said @ 11:04pm GMT on 27th Jun
"And then to top it all off, you silly fucks actually think you'll be able to put up a fight if things legitimately devolve into open violence."

Yeah, if it comes to that go ahead and kill me. Right on prime time TV. Let's see how that plays out.

You think I am afraid of violence? Violence is the last act of desperate men, and if you think some sort of overt threat of it would clam me from righteous anger over placing children in cages, or denying due process rights to anyone, you are mistaken.

I don't suspect that is a fight I will win with violence. It's one I will win without it.
norok said @ 3:11pm GMT on 27th Jun [Score:1 Interesting]
Based on your self description, this might be relevant to you: New York Times Opinion: How Much Can Democrats Count on Suburban Liberals?
midden said @ 8:35pm GMT on 27th Jun
That train riding study is sadly revealing. Thanks for sharing the link.

I'm probably not too typical, though. I'm a middle aged white guy living in a black majority rural area, and commute into the DC suburbs for work. I'm definitely a minority in my neighborhood, town, and county, but I'm surrounded by a very left leaning community, as I tend to be myself. I'm also in solidly blue Maryland, regardless of ethnicity.

I'm probably not too typical as far as white liberals go, though, having grown up in Columbia MD, one of the most diverse communities in the US, as far as "interracial" marriages, of pretty much every ethnicity. My high school demographics these days are about 35% Asian, 10% African American, 5% Hispanic/Latino, 7% multi-ethnic, 39% Caucasian, not to mention several gay classmates back in the early 80s. What a gift that was. I still take a five mile walk in Columbia every Sunday with my best friend, who also attended that same high school. It's not at all unusual for us to hear Spanish, Polish, Korean, Japanese, Russian, Hindi, Arabic, etc. on our Sunday walks, and I'm sure many of the people we see every week assume that we are a gay couple. Talk about a liberal bubble! It's a great place, though. In many ways I think it has exceeded Jim Rouse's greatest dreams as far as inclusion, diversity and harmony goes. Columbia Maryland is a model of what the rest of America could be, in a more perfect world. (It still has plenty of problems, of course. It is far from perfect.)

I also had the benefit of going from Columbia in my teens, to a college that had about 1/3 international students and faculty. I've been surrounded by a remarkable amount of diversity my whole life. It's really freaking weird when I go somewhere in the mid west and all I see is white people for days at a time. (Or even man European cities.) It's like a surreal David Lynch movie or something.

My point in all of this is that it's easy for me to take diversity and acceptance for granted. I'm sure my views and positions are heavily influenced by the Exposure theory. Most Americans have been no where near as fortunate.
rylex said @ 2:13am GMT on 27th Jun
I'm sure more rational and reasonable minds will find a better solution.

But if not, here's to hoping!
HoZay said @ 1:49pm GMT on 27th Jun
This fall''s election will tell the tale. If voters don't take congress away from the Republicans, or if they ratfuck their way around the voters, then we're fucked.
midden said @ 8:40pm GMT on 27th Jun
Yeah, I'm trying to hold on for that. If this is a truly self-correcting system as designed, we will know in a few months. If not, I fear we are fucked.
rylex said @ 2:10am GMT on 27th Jun
Tl:dr

California hates trump and sessions. News at 11.
lilmookieesquire said @ 3:58am GMT on 27th Jun
I'm more impressed that religious leaders are standing up for their principles. It's really really nice to see that kind of leadership when we need it.
midden said @ 8:54pm GMT on 27th Jun
Yes. Even as an atheist, I agree. Good leadership is invaluable. It did take longer/more extreme pressure than I think it should, though.
steele said @ 2:32am GMT on 27th Jun
Some good news today: Looks like Oklahoma has passed Medicinal Marijuana and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez beat Joseph Crowley in the New York's Dem primary for the 14th district.
norok said @ 3:04pm GMT on 27th Jun
Should we just have open borders?
midden said @ 8:52pm GMT on 27th Jun
Ultimately, if humanity is to long survive, yes. It seems to work pretty well between the States.
Ussmak said @ 10:12pm GMT on 27th Jun
We had to have a civil war to make the current system tenable.

Even if we become a multi-planet species, odds are, a border system of sorts will still be used.

midden said @ 10:28pm GMT on 27th Jun
Absolutely. Borders are wonderful things for keeping track of the movement of goods, wealth, and people, all of which can help society function more efficiently and regulate itself for the greater good. This does not mean borders should impede such movement. Open borders, yes. No borders, no.
steele said @ 3:49pm GMT on 27th Jun
Mookie mook moo, did you also see the article I tagged you in regarding low income in the Bay area? We got offtopic. :D
5432 said @ 3:53pm GMT on 27th Jun [Score:-2 Boring]
filtered comment under your threshold
midden said @ 8:50pm GMT on 27th Jun [Score:-1]
filtered comment under your threshold
Ussmak said @ 10:10pm GMT on 27th Jun [Score:-1]
filtered comment under your threshold
midden said @ 10:22pm GMT on 27th Jun [Score:-1]
filtered comment under your threshold

Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment, then click the reply link on that comment instead]

You must be logged in to comment on posts.



Posts of Import
Karma
SE v2 Closed BETA
First Post
Subscriptions and Things

Karma Rankings
ScoobySnacks
HoZay
Paracetamol
lilmookieesquire
Ankylosaur