Wednesday, 20 December 2017

The Dangers of Elite Projection

quote [ Elite projection is the belief, among relatively fortunate and influential people, that what those people find convenient or attractive is good for the society as a whole. Once you learn to recognize this simple mistake, you see it everywhere. It is perhaps the single most comprehensive barrier to prosperous, just, and liberating cities. ]

Read the article that caused Elon Musk to act like a brat on twitter!

There are 170,000 fewer retail jobs in 2017โ€”and 75,000 more Amazon robots
[SFW] [business] [+7 Good]
[by raphael_the_turtle@5:03pmGMT]


steele said @ 11:27pm GMT on 20th Dec [Score:2]
ITT: Fuck poor people.
Kama-Kiri said[1] @ 11:21pm GMT on 20th Dec [Score:1 Underrated]
In general though (liberal) elites are really big on public transit since if all the stupid poor people would only ride the bus like they are supposed to it means they can drive to work on less congested roads and there would be less air pollution when they go out jogging.

I would suggest that public transit is seen by the bulk of (American) society as something for kids and old folks to use. Cars are more convenient, if you have one you want to be able to drive it.
conception said @ 11:46pm GMT on 20th Dec
The article makes a good point, but I'm not sure Public Transit is the hill to die on. In 10 years, or less, car ownership will probably be a weirder thing than we think. Netflix for Cars will 100% be a thing. You just pay $10/mo and you get unlimited car rides in the city in self-driving electric cars. Significantly cheaper than the $50+/mo for a bus pass. With driverless, non-polluting cars - mass transit within a metro area doesn't make any sense.
raphael_the_turtle said @ 12:00am GMT on 21st Dec
Now, the same mistake powers the endless vague promises of tech disruption in transit, especially the mathematically absurd notion that transit that comes to your door when you call it will scale to the entire population of a dense city. (Serious experts have largely abandoned this claim, but it is out there in the discourse, undermining support for transit that actually works.)

The author specifically addresses the misunderstanding about that being possible. Apparently that trending idea is a peeve of his.
rhesusmonkey said @ 6:27am GMT on 21st Dec
how "big" does the mass transit vehicle have to be to be effective? a bus can hold let's say 25 seated passengers, a minivan can hold 8, a sedan can hold 4. if you adopt a hub-and-spoke model then you can just move people between higher and lower capacity autonomous vehicles. door to door may make sense for local milkruns, but if people are thinking "Uber without a driver" (which, ironically Uber is) i also think that will fail.
raphael_the_turtle said @ 12:21pm GMT on 21st Dec
I don't know, that's not my specialty, but the author has a whole blog on this sort of material that may interest you.
conception said @ 5:52pm GMT on 21st Dec
I read his other article and don't really find it compelling. His argument is that the bus is a denser way to deal with moving people. But that doesn't solve the geometry problem he's talking about, it just delays it. And does so in a way that provides an inferior experience for those transporting themselves. It's not a solution, it's the same kicking of the can down the road.

I hope the future (20-40 years from now) doesn't look like a bunch of automated cars everywhere, but I REALLY hope the future doesn't look like a lot of buses everywhere.
mechanical contrivance said @ 3:17pm GMT on 21st Dec
I assume driverless buses will become popular before driverless cars will.
conception said @ 5:43pm GMT on 21st Dec
I was considering that but I feel like there is a larger human element with a bus driver - helping people, paying fares, seeing if people are waiting, etc.
norok said[1] @ 8:50pm GMT on 20th Dec [Score:-1]
filtered comment under your threshold
dolemite said @ 10:58pm GMT on 20th Dec [Score:5 Underrated]
You honestly just used your own anecdotes as evidence against an article about self-projection?

arrowhen said @ 9:52pm GMT on 20th Dec [Score:2]
I don't necessarily agree with your points, just upmodding to counter the reflex downmod. I appreciate the efforts you've been making lately to engage in reasonable discussion; I think some folks around here have forgotten what it's like to see dissenting opinions that aren't just blatant trolling.
raphael_the_turtle said @ 10:38pm GMT on 20th Dec [Score:1 Underrated]
It's not reflexive. A downmod happens to be more polite than the words I have for his constant mealy mouthed submissive streak he's got for the authoritarians. He's had his chance for polite debate and instead dodges and ignores when people put him in a corner. He's a joke who knows how to put two words together and for some reason certain people around here think that makes him intelligent. He's made clear his views and has shown to be full of shit. A downmod does the job just fine. You want to waste your time, go nuts.
arrowhen said @ 11:56pm GMT on 20th Dec
I think the downmod-without-comment treatment is fine for pure troll accounts like numbers and fish, but norok has actually been participating in the community like a normal human being lately, engaging in conversations about computers and video games or whatever without bringing politics into it at all. If the dude is willing to act like a community member, why shouldn't we be willing to treat him like one?
raphael_the_turtle said @ 12:23am GMT on 21st Dec [Score:1 Underrated]
Because he's still not bringing anything to the table I'm interested in. You're acting like 10 or 15 comments of not being an insufferable asshole should have me asking him out for drinks. That comment up there is the same self-centered bullshit he's constantly spewing. It's boring, it's predictable, and it's shortsighted.
lilmookieesquire said @ 10:51pm GMT on 20th Dec
rhesusmonkey said @ 6:19am GMT on 21st Dec [Score:1]
I rode the MARTA a few times in the mid 90's, biggest issue I saw was talkative day-drunk folks.
Here in Portland area there was a pretty bad stabbing on the MAX earlier this year, but that's not a regular occurance. i use the bus and light rail here pretty extensively even though i own a car - it is cheaper than owning two cars.

good mass transit is useful, poorly planned mass transit gets underutilized - The BART is a good example of the latter, though i was on the CalTrain for first time a few weeks back and it was reasonably nice.
conception said @ 5:57pm GMT on 21st Dec
I don't think you need car ownership to make it work - car ownership is just better in almost every-way to mass transit in most places. The alternative just needs to be better than owning and commuting with a car - which, let's be honest, is a pretty low bar.
Fish said[1] @ 6:22am GMT on 21st Dec [Score:-3]
filtered comment under your threshold

Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment, then click the reply link on that comment instead]

You must be logged in to comment on posts.

Posts of Import
4 More Years!
SE v2 Closed BETA
First Post
Subscriptions and Things
AskSE: What do you look like?

Karma Rankings