Who Owns the Future? -
Find out how data mining is widening the gap between the upper and middle classes.
|
Tuesday, 14 November 2017
quote [ Of the eligible Australians, the majority indicated that the law should be changed to allow same-sex couples to marry, with 7,817,247 (61.6 percent) responding "Yes" and 4,873,987 (38.4 percent) responding "No."
Nearly eight out of 10 eligible Australians (79.5 percent) expressed their view. All states and territories recorded a majority Yes response. ] Eat a bag of dicks, bigots. Or sex clams, whatever.
|
Comments
 |
eggboy said @ 11:33pm GMT on 14th Nov
Ah, you're too quick
|
|
sacrelicious said @ 12:25am GMT on 15th Nov
in posting, unlike marriage, it's not usually best to wait five minutes to make sure.
|
|
1111 said @ 1:58am GMT on 15th Nov
 |
|
Ankylosaur said @ 1:18pm GMT on 15th Nov
[Score:1 laz0r]
Small digited numbers uses #Biblical polygamist marriage to promote Soviet-era #whataboutism. CHILLING!
|
|
eggboy said @ 12:08am GMT on 16th Nov
Ha, Chris Pyne pulled a Cruz, but gayer.
Reckons he was hacked which is a bad look for a defence minister regardless https://mobile.twitter.com/MarkDiStef/status/930815981810745345 |
|
1111 said @ 11:52pm GMT on 14th Nov
[Score:-5]
filtered comment under your threshold |
|
arrowhen said @ 12:49am GMT on 15th Nov
NEXT THING YOU KNOW THEY'LL BE MARRYING DUCKS!!1!
Poisonous man-eating Australian ducks. |
|
1111 said[2] @ 1:31am GMT on 15th Nov
[Score:-5]
filtered comment under your threshold |
|
arrowhen said @ 3:20am GMT on 15th Nov
I'm all for it. Consenting adults should be free to make whatever domestic/sexual/financial arrangements they want with other consenting adults. If traditionally marrying someone gives them specific rights and responsibilities where you're concerned, you should be free to grant those rights and responsibilities, in whole or in part, to any person or persons willing to enter into a contract with you, even if the details of your particular arrangement aren't found in the Bible.
|
|
1111 said @ 8:13am GMT on 15th Nov
[Score:-3 Boring]
filtered comment under your threshold |
|
arrowhen said @ 10:23am GMT on 15th Nov
[Score:0 Informative]
It was a pretty common slippery slope/ad absurdum style argument against gay marriage: "If we let the gays marry, what's next? What if a guy wants TWO wives? What if a guy wants to marry a HORSE? Where will it END!?" Hence my earlier redyelly comment.
|
|
1111 said @ 1:19pm GMT on 15th Nov
[Score:-2 Boring]
filtered comment under your threshold |
|
R1Xhard said @ 3:16am GMT on 15th Nov
[Score:-2 Underrated]
filtered comment under your threshold |
Post a comment
[note: if you are replying to a specific comment,
then click the reply link on that comment instead]You must be logged in to comment on posts.
