Yeah, I don't know what sorts of rules hosts put into place but unless the site was blatantly breaking them and slipping under the radar, I'm not a fan of this.

From Godaddy TOS:

You agree that GoDaddy, in its sole discretion and without liability to you, may refuse to accept the registration of any domain name. GoDaddy also may in its sole discretion and without liability to you delete the registration of any domain name during the first thirty (30) days after registration has taken place. GoDaddy may also cancel the registration of a domain name, after thirty (30) days, if that name is being used, as determined by GoDaddy in its sole discretion, in association with spam or morally objectionable activities. Morally objectionable activities will include, but not be limited to:

Activities prohibited by the laws of the United States and/or foreign territories in which you conduct business;
Activities designed to encourage unlawful behavior by others, such as hate crimes, terrorism and child pornography; and
Activities designed to harm or use unethically minors in any way.

From Google's registration TOS:

This includes in particular the use of a domain name by infringing a prohibition in law, the good morals as well as rights of third parties (trademark rights, name rights, copy rights, data protection rights etc.) or the active support of such violations, making available of content that of glorifies violence, inciting, racist or radical right-wing content, the instructions for criminal acts and content that are appropriate to degrade a third party or group of third parties in their human dignity (hatepages), the unauthorized intrusion into third party computers or computer systems, the distribution of malicious software, the forgery, the mailing of unrequested or undesirable e-mails for advertising purposes to third parties (Spamming). Customer is obliged to comply with all legal requirements and policies with the provision of pornographic and/or erotic content.

That's fair, then.

And now I know. Thanks.

What? You don't read the terms of service? :P

GoDaddy & Google can't afford to shrug this off, then the story would be all about them. Maybe they'll find a Russian host.

They're private companies. Pretty sure the Terms of Service everyone just checks off to continue have verbiage that they can in fact nix your shit for whatever reason.

Last I checked, 'Nazi' wasn't a protected class.

And thus we see the danger of 'protected' classes.

Free speech for everyone you agree with?

Calling for violence isn't protected speech and you know that.

I never said it was.

The Nazis worked out a peaceful protest with the city. The police sat on their hands– go read the account in the New York Times.

Antifa organized the attack online. You may have seen that the DOJ has asked for IP addresses (ahead of a subpoena, one assumes) of those who were communicating on antifa sites.

I ask you: Who came armed to fight (besides the Nazis and others– who had the firepower to unleash a hellstorm)? Who organized a fight in advance? Who wore masks?

Your friends in antifa are not the helpless sorority girls you suppose and portray them to be...

We have literal nazis and white supremists killing people in the street, but sure, the protected classes are the dangerous ones.

It's a Constitutional right for anyone to peaceably assemble and say whatever they want. Even people you disagree with.

No one has to listen to them, but no one has the right to silence them.

The presence of a protest or counter-protest isn't silencing. Its people exercising their right to assemble and express themselves. Freedom of expression doesn't mean no one can react to the awful shit you say.

You...you don't actually have the right to say whatever you want. You know that, right?
For example, yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theater isn't protected speech. Making death threats isn't protected speech. Running people over with your fucking car isn't protected speech.

The Nazis had a permit to protest, secured in advance from the city.

Antifa was organized online in advance of the protest, and did not have a permit; they came with masks and baseball bats. They attacked. The police did not protect the legally assembled protestors. Same thing happened in Chicago (courtesy of Jan Schakowsky's husband with the tacit blessing of the Obama administration) and to Milo, Coulter and others in Berkley.

I find it ironic that a group who claims to be 'anti-fascist' wears masks and enforces their worldview with violence. You might want to examine that point and consider whether you want to be a part of defending them.

Freedom of expression doesn't mean no one can react to the awful shit you say.

As long as their reaction doesn't harm or impede others.

For example, yelling "Fire!" in a crowded theater isn't protected speech. Making death threats isn't protected speech.
This is so obvious as to be condescending. Was I defending people making death threats?

Running people over with your fucking car isn't protected speech.
True. But we learned from Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown that the hot takes from the leftist media are almost universally wrong.

You don't know what happened with that car, and neither do I. Let's let the justice system have him and see what they come up with. I would not be surprised if the driver is guilty of murder. I would also not be surprised if he was fleeing the antifa goons in a panic and (perhaps rightfully) feared for his life.

I don't mind it. It's not like the Daily Stormer won't find another registrar to use, and I don't think GoDaddy or anyone else should be forced to host a domain if they don't want to.

Yes, I thought of that. Still, I'm ok with companies refusing business from nazis who promote violence.

I'm still waiting for Twitter to cut off Trump for violating their TOS
Being in a position to actually dump a load of nukes on someone and then tweeting about it seems like "inciting violence" as well.

Discord app dropped them too. They come across really annoying and stupid when they whine about it.

i also saw that anonymous supposedly hacked the daily stormer.

although, I have also seen statements online indicating the daily stormer is lying about the hacking to stir up sympathy.

Yeah, the timing of the supposed threat to shut down the site is suspiciously at the same time GoDaddy is going to shut them down. Plus, Anonymous is publicly denying the hack.

Anonymous has denied stuff at first to claim it later.

but yeah, I'm also leaning towards false flag by daily stormer

I'm not sure you're grasping the meaning of the word "Anonymous."

That's the name of that famous hacker guy, right?

Mr. Btard.